Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:13:41 GMT
Message-ID: <pN3Dg.39411$pu3.518150_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:11:23 GMT, Bob Badour
> <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>Testing?!? That has to go too. Testing implies that some databases are
>>wrong. Labelling them as such will hurt their self-esteem and could send
>>them into a spiral of negativity from which they might never escape. We
>>don't want that on our karma. Instead, there are no wrong answers --
>>merely 'inventive' answers. We don't test. Instead, we observe databases
> > ^^^^^^^^^ > That word has bad connotations, suggesting dishonesty. > "creative" might be a better fit.
Invention is now the mother of dishonesty?!? Since when? Why didn't I receive the memo?
Then again, invention does lead to the exploitation of the working class while destroying their jobs and promoting rampant materialist consumerism. Hmmm... and come to think of it, it does have some associations with patriarchy and drug abuse too.
Yes, creative it is then. It's got that whole birth, rebirth, fertility, gaia zeitgeist thing going for it.
>>in small groups in a stress-free, encouraging environment.
Received on Fri Aug 11 2006 - 20:13:41 CEST