Re: Why bother with Logical data model?
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ucantrade.com.NOTHERE>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:07:21 -0700
Message-ID: <lkapd2hc8g4p1pg29cd237tmkrdidd9f0l_at_4ax.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:07:21 -0700
Message-ID: <lkapd2hc8g4p1pg29cd237tmkrdidd9f0l_at_4ax.com>
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:11:23 GMT, Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
[snip]
>Testing?!? That has to go too. Testing implies that some databases are
>wrong. Labelling them as such will hurt their self-esteem and could send
>them into a spiral of negativity from which they might never escape. We
>don't want that on our karma. Instead, there are no wrong answers --
>merely 'inventive' answers. We don't test. Instead, we observe databases
^^^^^^^^^ That word has bad connotations, suggesting dishonesty."creative" might be a better fit.
>in small groups in a stress-free, encouraging environment.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko Received on Fri Aug 11 2006 - 19:07:21 CEST