Re: Performance degrade after migrate db from NT to HP-UX

NT is 4K, HP-UX is 8K

Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_nsw.bigpond.net.au.nospam> wrote in message news:3ab394db.27882301_at_news-server...
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 23:33:53 +0800, "Eddy" <eddyng_at_netvigator.com>
> wrote:
>
> >We're using dedicated server with TNSNAMES only on HP-UX now. Both NT &
> >HP-UX on the same subnet and we're in client-server model by using
> >PowerBuilder, therefore, the startup time is the same, only when
 retriving
> >online data from db has different....
> >
>
> Interesting. I wonder if there is any difference in block sizes being
> sent on HP. If you use TNSNAMES also in your NT server, does the
> listener.ora and the tnsnames.ora look the same in both systems?
> Ie, are there any additional parameters on NT that aren't in HP?
>
> Definitely something wrong with the online side. If performance OK in
> batch, that means the database is OK. Gotta be something in the net.
>
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> nsouto_at_bigpond.net.au.nospam
> http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/the_Den/index.html
Received on Sat Mar 17 2001 - 20:36:11 CST