Re: Performance degrade after migrate db from NT to HP-UX

Don't complaint to Network. Network normally fine. I have been doing a lot of testing on NT VS LINUX vs SUn Solaris for ORACLE 8i. NT normally have best I/O performance than any other O.S. This explain the OLTP performance issue.

In article <3ab394db.27882301_at_news-server>, nsouto_at_nsw.bigpond.net.au.nospam says...
>
>On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 23:33:53 +0800, "Eddy" <eddyng_at_netvigator.com>
>wrote:
>
>>We're using dedicated server with TNSNAMES only on HP-UX now. Both NT &
>>HP-UX on the same subnet and we're in client-server model by using
>>PowerBuilder, therefore, the startup time is the same, only when retriving
>>online data from db has different....
>>
>
>Interesting. I wonder if there is any difference in block sizes being
>sent on HP. If you use TNSNAMES also in your NT server, does the
>listener.ora and the tnsnames.ora look the same in both systems?
>Ie, are there any additional parameters on NT that aren't in HP?
>
>Definitely something wrong with the online side. If performance OK in
>batch, that means the database is OK. Gotta be something in the net.
>
>Cheers
>Nuno Souto
>nsouto_at_bigpond.net.au.nospam
>http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/the_Den/index.html
Received on Sat Mar 17 2001 - 18:09:11 CST