Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:23:25 GMT
Message-ID: <NR%Eg.50616$pu3.587824_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>


erk wrote:
> Bob Badour wrote:
>

>>erk wrote:
>>
>>>dawn wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yes, I've read those terms.  I do understand the use of "unstructured"
>>>>within an attribute value, such as an attribute whose value is a
>>>>document.  That doesn't make the whole unstructured.  The fact that a
>>>>database holds music doesn't make the database any less structured.
>>>>There can be a structured database that includes unstructured attribute
>>>>values.
>>>
>>>The word "structured" here is a waste of time.
>>
>>Why do you folks bother with self-aggrandizing trolls? She has you all
>>chasing your tails.
>>
>>'Structure' means different things in different contexts.

>
>
> True - I was just exploring the meaning of the words in a relational
> context. I was bothering for the benefit of anyone who might be
> reading

How does legitimizing the self-aggrandizing cranks help anyone who might be reading? Received on Thu Aug 17 2006 - 17:23:25 CEST

Original text of this message