Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:23:25 GMT
Message-ID: <NR%Eg.50616$pu3.587824_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
>
> True - I was just exploring the meaning of the words in a relational
> context. I was bothering for the benefit of anyone who might be
> reading
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:23:25 GMT
Message-ID: <NR%Eg.50616$pu3.587824_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
erk wrote:
> Bob Badour wrote:
>
>>erk wrote: >> >>>dawn wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Yes, I've read those terms. I do understand the use of "unstructured" >>>>within an attribute value, such as an attribute whose value is a >>>>document. That doesn't make the whole unstructured. The fact that a >>>>database holds music doesn't make the database any less structured. >>>>There can be a structured database that includes unstructured attribute >>>>values. >>> >>>The word "structured" here is a waste of time. >> >>Why do you folks bother with self-aggrandizing trolls? She has you all >>chasing your tails. >> >>'Structure' means different things in different contexts.
>
>
> True - I was just exploring the meaning of the words in a relational
> context. I was bothering for the benefit of anyone who might be
> reading
How does legitimizing the self-aggrandizing cranks help anyone who might be reading? Received on Thu Aug 17 2006 - 17:23:25 CEST