Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements

Bob Badour wrote:
> erk wrote:
> > dawn wrote:
> >
> >>Yes, I've read those terms. I do understand the use of "unstructured"
> >>within an attribute value, such as an attribute whose value is a
> >>document. That doesn't make the whole unstructured. The fact that a
> >>database holds music doesn't make the database any less structured.
> >>There can be a structured database that includes unstructured attribute
> >> values.
> >
> > The word "structured" here is a waste of time.
>
> Why do you folks bother with self-aggrandizing trolls? She has you all
> chasing your tails.
>
> 'Structure' means different things in different contexts.

True - I was just exploring the meaning of the words in a relational context. I was bothering for the benefit of anyone who might be reading, and because I think the discussion is at least useful to me.

• erk