Re: why hierarchy?
Date: 1 Aug 2006 10:52:57 -0700
Message-ID: <1154454777.568979.260460_at_p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
Neo wrote:
> The above article compares CODASYL Network to RM. Dbd
> isn't based on CODASYL Network, Hierarchal, MV, RM, XML,
> RDF, ProLog, lists, LISP or some combination thereof. It
> is based on something more fundamental that allows it to
> do all that the above can do but in a more general manner,
> thus requiring more processing power and memory.
Still waiting for you to describe that "something more fundamental" as clearly and concisely as lists, cons cells, networks, hierarchies, and relations have been described by numerous people numerous times.
It really shouldn't be so hard, why do you keep avoiding it?
And no, nobody wants to infer it from reems of lisp-like examples. Instead state it clearly and concisely in plain human language and/or mathematics.
It really shouldn't be so hard, why do you keep avoiding it?
- Keith -- Fraud 6