Re: why hierarchy?

From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 1 Aug 2006 09:50:20 -0700
Message-ID: <1154451020.652068.230540_at_b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

> http://www.intelligententerprise.com/db_area/archives/1999/991105/online2.jhtml;jsessionid=4J3MNANICW05WQSNDLRCKHSCJUNN2JVN

The above article compares CODASYL Network to RM. Dbd isn't based on CODASYL Network, Hierarchal, MV, RM, XML, RDF, ProLog, lists, LISP or some combination thereof. It is based on something more fundamental that allows it to do all that the above can do but in a more general manner, thus requiring more processing power and memory. Received on Tue Aug 01 2006 - 18:50:20 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bob Badour: "Re: The Database that Understands What It's Told"
Previous message: Neo: "Re: why hierarchy?"
Maybe in reply to: JOG: "Re: why hierarchy?"
Next in thread: JOG: "Re: why hierarchy?"
Reply: JOG: "Re: why hierarchy?"
Reply: Keith H Duggar: "Re: why hierarchy?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message