Re: Windows vs Linux Performance

hpuxrac wrote:
> EscVector wrote:
> > hpuxrac wrote:
> > > EscVector wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > Umm that's a lot of words to accompany what looks to be a hack job of
> > > an article.
> > >
> > > The problems behind what was written are obvious. The faces and rod
> > > stewart captured it well in the old album "A nod is as good as a wink
> > > to a blind horse"!
> >
> > Hey thanks for the compliment. I just wrote that this morning. I've
> > been trying to get some things published. Maybe I'm on the right path.
> > If you can find an article similar, please let me know. :)
> >
> > What you wrote is not obvious to me. Do you mean there are problems
> > with what I wrote or problems with the referenced paper?
>
> Sorry the paper that appears to have been "paid for" to be written as
> such. Looks like marketing not any kind of benchmark or research to me.

Agreed! Response time benchmarks are good, but I want to see plans. I tried to contact the author, but no response. I guess they have their hands full implementing on Windows.... :) Received on Tue Jan 23 2007 - 14:22:57 CST