EscVector wrote:
> hpuxrac wrote:
>> EscVector wrote:
>>> hpuxrac wrote:
>>>> EscVector wrote:
>>>> Umm that's a lot of words to accompany what looks to be a hack job of
>>>> an article.
>>>>
>>>> The problems behind what was written are obvious. The faces and rod
>>>> stewart captured it well in the old album "A nod is as good as a wink
>>>> to a blind horse"!
>>> Hey thanks for the compliment. I just wrote that this morning. I've
>>> been trying to get some things published. Maybe I'm on the right path.
>>> If you can find an article similar, please let me know. :)
>>>
>>> What you wrote is not obvious to me. Do you mean there are problems
>>> with what I wrote or problems with the referenced paper?
>> Sorry the paper that appears to have been "paid for" to be written as
>> such. Looks like marketing not any kind of benchmark or research to me.
>
> Agreed! Response time benchmarks are good, but I want to see plans. I
> tried to contact the author, but no response. I guess they have their
> hands full implementing on Windows.... :)
Or hiding from people that know how to use a terminal window.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org
Received on Tue Jan 23 2007 - 14:58:29 CST
