Re: tough choices

From: Ian <ianbjor_at_mobileaudio.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:10:41 -0700
Message-ID: <40db97b1$1_1@corp.newsgroups.com>

Daniel Morgan wrote:
> Larry wrote:
>

>> Hmmm.
>>
>> "Ah yes.  One of those things that never get added to the TCO of the 
>> 'equivalent' configurations. Just like Tivoli for even the most basic 
>> security. Ah well, in character.  What can one say..."
>>
>> I guess saying "Tivoli is required" is open to interpretation, huh 
>> Daniel?
>>
>> Larry Edelstein

>
>
> I think not. Required to match, or at least come close to, Oracle's
> base security offering. But if you don't need that level of security
> not necessary. It really comes down to how valuable the assets are
> that you are protecting.

Can you list the specific security features that are provided with the base Oracle product that are missing from DB2 UDB for LUW?

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- Received on Thu Jun 24 2004 - 22:10:41 CDT