Re: How about an Oracle debate?

"Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote in message news:40c6ac78$0$1588$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-downwithspammersfamily_at_attbi.net> wrote in message
> news:IQxxc.65105$eY2.12457_at_attbi_s02...
>
> > Are all the participants going to have to wear those Hill Billy teeth?
(to
> > give it more of a Jerry Springer look)
> > Jim
>
> As I believe I've already posted elsewhere, the mere fact that you (and
> others) find the proposal amusing means Don's already achieved what he set
> out to achieve by making it.... distracting people from paying attention
to
> his unprofessional tactics of *suppressing* debate and technical scrutiny
by
> approaching one's employers if you cross him.
>
> It isn't a cause for hilarity, I hope, to discover this man knows very
> little technically about Oracle, but that he will threaten you, abuse you,
> and try and get you sacked to stop that little nugget of truth being made
> public.
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
>

Howard,
I'm not for a Jerry Springer type "discussion", it isn't something I would waste my time watching. I take a more scientific approach to Oracle and so I find it difficult to see how a major controversy should arise. (assuming that there is a reasoned scientific approach) Just trying to inject a little humor.
Jim Received on Wed Jun 09 2004 - 09:14:46 CDT