Re: Performance Diff between 12 and 19
From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:34:40 +0000
Message-ID: <LNXP265MB1562167D3045976DD15EC236A5FD0_at_LNXP265MB1562.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org> on behalf of Clay Jackson (cjackson) <Clay.Jackson_at_quest.com> Sent: 12 March 2020 16:31
To: oracle list
Subject: Performance Diff between 12 and 19
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:34:40 +0000
Message-ID: <LNXP265MB1562167D3045976DD15EC236A5FD0_at_LNXP265MB1562.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
I got a significant difference in workload, probably driven by 6,000 executions in 19.3 of:
select count(1)
from
sys.idnseq$ where seqobj# = :1
For the 1,000 in a loop I have mechanism that can call a simple script from SQL*Plus 1,000 times. The effects may vary if you have a PL/SQL loop, or (e.g.) a java loop.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org> on behalf of Clay Jackson (cjackson) <Clay.Jackson_at_quest.com> Sent: 12 March 2020 16:31
To: oracle list
Subject: Performance Diff between 12 and 19
id number primary key,
c1 varchar2(1000)
);
create table test_tab2 (
id number primary key,
c1 varchar2(1000)
);
create table test_tab2 (
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Mar 12 2020 - 18:34:40 CET