Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Anyone using multi-block sizes for their databases
oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org gravou em 2005-08-04 15:34:02:
> I had a paper published in the proceedings of
> Computer Measurement Group and Oracle Internals
> Magazine on this topic. Well, not exactly
> this topic, but multiple buffer pools to be
> exact so they are orthoganal in my opinion
If they are orthogonal, the paper would be irrelevant. I guess you meant related.
> anyone want to see it? it is 247 bytes PDF
> and I don't think I am supposed to email that to the
> list so ....
I doubt a 247B PDF doc would be useful, and 247kiB doesn't sound big, while 247MiB sounds too big to be true.
Anyway, can't you just put it at a website, or point us to an URL from the authors?
-- Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA Administrador de Bases de Dados +55 (11) 4390 5383 Toyota do Brasil Ltda ldutra_at_toyota.com.br São Bernardo do Campo, SP BRASIL This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged and intended solely for the use of the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by returning via e-mail as well as delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. TOYOTA DO BRASIL LTDA (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication, neither for personal, nonbusiness related information nor opinion sent through this email or even for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. TOYOTA DO BRASIL LTDA (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been kept nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Aug 04 2005 - 15:22:17 CDT
![]() |
![]() |