Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: NetApp (was utl_file_dir)

RE: NetApp (was utl_file_dir)

From: Ron Rogers <RROGERS_at_galottery.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 09:00:19 -0500
Message-Id: <10701.123647@fatcity.com>


Using "time" as a factor that we all are judged by... Is it quicker to = backup the INDX datafiles and restore them if needed OR create the indexes =

after a restore?  Knowing that the database can be available to the user =
community without indexes but the "service" will be degraded and poor at =
best. The creation of some indexes can take longer than the restore from =
backup along with the data restore. It takes 4 =BD hrs to backup 68 GIG to = tape and takes 4 =BD hrs to do a full restore. It takes approx 6 hrs just = to do 1 of the large indexes on the 6 GIG table.

2 bits worth.
ROR m=AA=BF=AAm

>>> Winnie_Liu_at_infonet.com 12/04/00 07:55PM >>>

I will agree that both TEMP and INDEX are "easy" to rebuild. You sure that they don't require you to backup RBS? It is not easy to rebuild it at all! :D Received on Tue Dec 05 2000 - 08:00:19 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US