This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0717_01C03F62.71B6BC80
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
does the order become same if recompile it twice ?
ajay
- Original Message -----=20
From: Balakrishnan Subramanian=20
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L=20
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: Patch of the day??
RE: Patch of the day??Right now in 8.1.6, we are facing a bug (# =
782989), which is just reversing the order of the arguments in =
procedure/function after we recompile them using the alter command or =
Oracle compiles to validate them. There is no pactch and Oracle said, =
it will be fixed in 8.1.7.
- Original Message -----=20
From: Koivu, Lisa=20
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L=20
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 3:51 PM
Subject: RE: Patch of the day??
Hi Rodd,=20
We've been running 8.1.6.2 on HP/UX 11.0 32- and 64-bit with no =
serious problems. One fixed bug bit us, but that was it. Upgrading the =
database itself was painful, but after the upgrade completed, the =
database and the code ran (and still runs) fine.=20
HTH=20
Lisa Rutland Koivu=20
Oracle Database Administrator=20
Qode.com=20
4850 North State Road 7=20
Suite G104=20
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33319=20
V: 954.484.3191, x174=20
F: 954.484.2933=20
C: 954.658.5849=20
http://www.qode.com=20
"The information contained herein does not express the opinion or =
position of Qode.com and cannot be attributed to or made binding upon =
Qode.com."
-----Original Message-----=20
From: Holman, Rodney [mailto:rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com]=20
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 1:52 PM=20
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L=20
Subject: Patch of the day??=20
Help the patches are getting to me!!!=20
I am working on migrating a system from 8.0.5.1 to 8i (HP-UX 11.0 =
32Bit).=20
I have installed 8.1.6, am downloading 8.1.6.2.1 patchset (it's =
listed as=20
8.1.6.2.0 on Metalink I checked with them this AM).=20
While on the phone with the support folks they told me I should be =
going to=20
8.1.7.=20
8.1.6 has been patched 4 times in 3 months with fairly major =
patches (by=20
looking at the readme's), and is now being superseeded with 8.1.7. =
Do I=20
even want to continue with 8.1.6.x or should I wait for the 8.1.7 to =
arrive=20
and go with it? Do any of you have expierence with either/both? =
Any ideas?=20
I'm under some time constraints to get this tested and implemented =
by Nov=20
15th.=20
Rodd Holman=20
Enterprise Data Systems Engineer=20
LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation=20
rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com=20
--=20
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com=20
--=20
Author: Holman, Rodney=20
INET: rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com=20
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051=20
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing =
Lists
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message=20
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in=20
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L=20
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may=20
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). =
------=_NextPart_000_0717_01C03F62.71B6BC80
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3105.105" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>does the order become same if recompile =
it twice=20
?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>ajay</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A href=3D"mailto:bala.subramanian_at_wcom.com"=20
title=3Dbala.subramanian_at_wcom.com>Balakrishnan Subramanian</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
href=3D"mailto:ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com"=20
title=3DORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, October 26, =
2000 4:56=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Patch of the =
day??</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>RE: Patch of the day??Right now in 8.1.6, we are facing =
a bug=20
(# 782989), which is just reversing the order of the arguments in=20
procedure/function after we recompile them using the alter command or =
Oracle=20
compiles to validate them. There is no pactch and Oracle said, =
it will=20
be fixed in 8.1.7.<BR> ----- Original Message ----- <BR> =
From:=20
Koivu, Lisa <BR> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L =
<BR> =20
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 3:51 PM<BR> Subject: RE: Patch =
of the=20
day??<BR><BR><BR> Hi Rodd, <BR><BR> We've been running =
8.1.6.2 on=20
HP/UX 11.0 32- and 64-bit with no serious problems. One fixed =
bug bit=20
us, but that was it. Upgrading the database itself was painful, =
but=20
after the upgrade completed, the database and the code ran (and still =
runs)=20
fine. <BR><BR> HTH <BR><BR> Lisa Rutland Koivu <BR> =
Oracle=20
Database Administrator <BR> Qode.com <BR> 4850 North State =
Road 7=20
<BR> Suite G104 <BR> Fort Lauderdale, FL 33319=20
<BR><BR> V: 954.484.3191, x174 <BR> F: 954.484.2933 =
<BR> C:=20
954.658.5849 <BR>
http://www.qode.com <BR><BR> "The =
information=20
contained herein does not express the opinion or position of Qode.com =
and=20
cannot be attributed to or made binding upon =
Qode.com."<BR><BR><BR><BR> =20
-----Original Message----- <BR> From: Holman, Rodney=20
[mailto:rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com] <BR> Sent: Thursday, October =
26,=20
2000 1:52 PM <BR> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L =
<BR> =20
Subject: Patch of the day?? <BR><BR><BR><BR> Help the patches =
are=20
getting to me!!! <BR><BR> I am working on migrating a system =
from=20
8.0.5.1 to 8i (HP-UX 11.0 32Bit). <BR> I have installed 8.1.6, =
am=20
downloading 8.1.6.2.1 patchset (it's listed as <BR> =
8.1.6.2.0 on=20
Metalink I checked with them this AM). <BR> While on the phone =
with the=20
support folks they told me I should be going to <BR> 8.1.7.=20
<BR><BR> 8.1.6 has been patched 4 times in 3 months with =
fairly=20
major patches (by <BR> looking at the readme's), and is now =
being=20
superseeded with 8.1.7. Do I <BR> even want to continue =
with=20
8.1.6.x or should I wait for the 8.1.7 to arrive <BR> and go =
with=20
it? Do any of you have expierence with either/both? Any =
ideas?=20
<BR><BR> I'm under some time constraints to get this tested and=20
implemented by Nov <BR> 15th. <BR><BR> Rodd Holman =
<BR> =20
Enterprise Data Systems Engineer <BR> LodgeNet Entertainment =
Corporation=20
<BR> rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com <BR><BR> -- <BR> =
Please see=20
the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
http://www.orafaq.com <BR> -- =
<BR> =20
Author: Holman, Rodney <BR> INET: =
rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com=20
<BR><BR> Fat City Network Services -- (858)=20
538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 <BR> San Diego,=20
California -- Public =
Internet access=20
/ Mailing Lists<BR> =20
--------------------------------------------------------------------=20
<BR> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail =
message=20
<BR> to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of =
'ListGuru') and in=20
<BR> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L =
<BR> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed =
Received on Thu Oct 26 2000 - 15:36:01 CDT