Ken Pulverman
Kenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07590887001568779492noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125
Updated: 3 hours 7 min ago
Quick! - Get Everyone In the Elevator; Why the First 30 Seconds May Count More Than Anything Else
Lately I've been thinking a lot about elevator pitches and video. A perfect opportunity emerged early this week to capture a few. I was at the Sales 2.0 Conference is San Francisco and Kodak a presenter and sponsor was giving away some of their portable video cameras. I won one. The organizer asked people who won a camera to capture video and upload it to the conference site. I was going to capture some video anyway, but this was a perfect entree to ask people to participate.
Most of the people at the booths there were in Sales or Marketing and were natural hams, so they were pretty easy going when I asked them to join in.
I think everyone here did a pretty good job. I learned a few things from a portable video capture perspective as well as the video elevator pitch perspective.
First the mechanical stuff....
The Kodak Zi8 rocks, but don't get too close. I used an external mic to capture better sound, but the cord just wasn't long enough to do my generous participants complete justice. You'll see some coffee cups in the background that are in perfect focus, while some of my subjects are a bit too close and fuzzy. If I had it to do all over again, I would add a long mic cable and bring a monopod. The camera actually did a credible job of capturing some of the screen detail especially if you watch the videos in HD.
Ok, with that out of the way, let's talk about the essence of an elevator pitch. I knew they were important, but I now appreciate their importance even more. In an era of social media, I believe its rapidly becoming the case that this is all we've got....a mere 30-45 seconds to make our case and how we deliver it may be just as important as what we have to say.
Some thoughts...
Keep it Tight - I asked everyone here to keep their pitch to between 30 and 45 seconds. Most people went about a minute and a half. That may work at the Burj Khalifa but I content that I don't think we have that long. Scratch the Burj comment, it turns out those elevators go 26.1 mph. Ok, I wasn't increadibly insistent on this point and these talented sales and marketing folks probably could have gotten very close if pressed, but I think you get my point. Even more important than speed is structure. How many points are you trying to get across? How well are the points organized? Do they develop the story in a compelling way? Do they facilitate the retelling of the story? Beta is volitility metric used to describe stock. Perhaps we should have a similar metric for the variability of the delivery of our messages.
Make Sure Everyone Can Do It - I went to a couple of the booths and the people standing there said so and so is our elevator pitch person. In some cases I had to come back. I guess the challenge here is what if I was a customer? ...and for some of these products, I probably am. The challenge to make the pitch eminently consummable falls to me an my marketing brethern. Us marketers need to make the story so easy to deliver and consume that anyone can do it.
Having Everyone Reherse Isn't Enough - The story, I content, needs to be tight, tight, tight. And one size never fits all. To do this really, really well, everyone needs a tightly architected story and a few alternative beginnings, middles, and ends that they can weave in. I believe there is a phase when we are first learning about a new idea - probably the first 15 seconds, when our ability to absorb that idea is most at peril. Some scientist has probably already given this a name. Please comment on the blog if you know it, but I am certain we are going to spend a lot more time talking about this window in marketing and advertising circles in the near future. As our brains try to connect elements of a new idea, we are at our most dismissive. I believe the part of the brain that processes this information is permanently set to skeptical. Unless we can explain it in plain english in a compelling way, we tune out. We may tune out because we don't have the foggiest idea of what the speaker is saying or it just doesn't sound interesting or convincing. While these folks all did a good job, think of what happens when you try to scale a message in your company. Not easy and not trivial.
Authenticity Trumps All - We've evolved as a species. No one could possibly hear a cigarette commerical today touting their health benefits and not become enraged. We know when we are being sold to. The hair on the backs of our necks stands up. Furthermore we pretty much hate it. That type of convincing someone to absorb and idea or take an action is very win - lose. This doesn't mean that we hate marketers or hate sales people, but they have to work harder appeal to us. Yes you have to understand our situation and you have to tell your story in a way that connects with us and a challenge we are facing. It's often said that people buy from people. This could easily be refined to be people buy from people they trust. Trust, I believe, comes from empathy, understanding, and the ability to convey an authentic belief that what you have solves the pain you are addressing.
A Picture Says a 1000 Words....and a 1 minute video is 150mb of pictures. To be fair here, most of these folks were somewhat put on the spot with a instant request to contribute to the content of a Sales 2.0 "we are going to share everything" kind of show and I'd give everyone here at least a "good" rating for their effort, but you will clearly see that some people are more comfortable than others. With the voice quality essentially normalized by my average quality lapel mic, and the video quality normalized to mediocre by my developing flash video skillset and the length of the microphone cable, note what you pick up in how people display emotion as they connect the dots of their solution.
I would say this is a fair look at what good to better than good looks like in the world today when it comes to elevator pitches. I would like to thank each of these brave souls for participating, and congratulate them for generally being at the top of their class. Having said that, I think us marketing types have our work cut out for us as we help our organizations content with what may be our most important message delivery vehicle today. When you think about it, it may be the most viral thing we can do.
Most of the people at the booths there were in Sales or Marketing and were natural hams, so they were pretty easy going when I asked them to join in.
I think everyone here did a pretty good job. I learned a few things from a portable video capture perspective as well as the video elevator pitch perspective.
First the mechanical stuff....
The Kodak Zi8 rocks, but don't get too close. I used an external mic to capture better sound, but the cord just wasn't long enough to do my generous participants complete justice. You'll see some coffee cups in the background that are in perfect focus, while some of my subjects are a bit too close and fuzzy. If I had it to do all over again, I would add a long mic cable and bring a monopod. The camera actually did a credible job of capturing some of the screen detail especially if you watch the videos in HD.
Ok, with that out of the way, let's talk about the essence of an elevator pitch. I knew they were important, but I now appreciate their importance even more. In an era of social media, I believe its rapidly becoming the case that this is all we've got....a mere 30-45 seconds to make our case and how we deliver it may be just as important as what we have to say.
Some thoughts...
Keep it Tight - I asked everyone here to keep their pitch to between 30 and 45 seconds. Most people went about a minute and a half. That may work at the Burj Khalifa but I content that I don't think we have that long. Scratch the Burj comment, it turns out those elevators go 26.1 mph. Ok, I wasn't increadibly insistent on this point and these talented sales and marketing folks probably could have gotten very close if pressed, but I think you get my point. Even more important than speed is structure. How many points are you trying to get across? How well are the points organized? Do they develop the story in a compelling way? Do they facilitate the retelling of the story? Beta is volitility metric used to describe stock. Perhaps we should have a similar metric for the variability of the delivery of our messages.
Make Sure Everyone Can Do It - I went to a couple of the booths and the people standing there said so and so is our elevator pitch person. In some cases I had to come back. I guess the challenge here is what if I was a customer? ...and for some of these products, I probably am. The challenge to make the pitch eminently consummable falls to me an my marketing brethern. Us marketers need to make the story so easy to deliver and consume that anyone can do it.
Having Everyone Reherse Isn't Enough - The story, I content, needs to be tight, tight, tight. And one size never fits all. To do this really, really well, everyone needs a tightly architected story and a few alternative beginnings, middles, and ends that they can weave in. I believe there is a phase when we are first learning about a new idea - probably the first 15 seconds, when our ability to absorb that idea is most at peril. Some scientist has probably already given this a name. Please comment on the blog if you know it, but I am certain we are going to spend a lot more time talking about this window in marketing and advertising circles in the near future. As our brains try to connect elements of a new idea, we are at our most dismissive. I believe the part of the brain that processes this information is permanently set to skeptical. Unless we can explain it in plain english in a compelling way, we tune out. We may tune out because we don't have the foggiest idea of what the speaker is saying or it just doesn't sound interesting or convincing. While these folks all did a good job, think of what happens when you try to scale a message in your company. Not easy and not trivial.
Authenticity Trumps All - We've evolved as a species. No one could possibly hear a cigarette commerical today touting their health benefits and not become enraged. We know when we are being sold to. The hair on the backs of our necks stands up. Furthermore we pretty much hate it. That type of convincing someone to absorb and idea or take an action is very win - lose. This doesn't mean that we hate marketers or hate sales people, but they have to work harder appeal to us. Yes you have to understand our situation and you have to tell your story in a way that connects with us and a challenge we are facing. It's often said that people buy from people. This could easily be refined to be people buy from people they trust. Trust, I believe, comes from empathy, understanding, and the ability to convey an authentic belief that what you have solves the pain you are addressing.
A Picture Says a 1000 Words....and a 1 minute video is 150mb of pictures. To be fair here, most of these folks were somewhat put on the spot with a instant request to contribute to the content of a Sales 2.0 "we are going to share everything" kind of show and I'd give everyone here at least a "good" rating for their effort, but you will clearly see that some people are more comfortable than others. With the voice quality essentially normalized by my average quality lapel mic, and the video quality normalized to mediocre by my developing flash video skillset and the length of the microphone cable, note what you pick up in how people display emotion as they connect the dots of their solution.
I would say this is a fair look at what good to better than good looks like in the world today when it comes to elevator pitches. I would like to thank each of these brave souls for participating, and congratulate them for generally being at the top of their class. Having said that, I think us marketing types have our work cut out for us as we help our organizations content with what may be our most important message delivery vehicle today. When you think about it, it may be the most viral thing we can do.
Lifetime Social Value, How Sony Screwed the Pooch
About a year after I started dating my girlfriend, who is now my Fiancee, she needed a new laptop. I helped her do the research and suggested a Sony laptop. Two months after it went out of warranty, the motherboard died. This was a well known issue at the time and was all over their website. Elaine called Sony, but they wouldn't budge and would only offer an unreasonable fee of over $600 to fix the problem. During this time, laptop prices had gone down and this fee made no economic sense.
I felt horrible about it. My family has been life long Sony bigots. Our first color TV was a Sony and we've had a strong preference for Sony products ever since including desktops, laptops, DVD players, stereos, Walkmen, clock radios, etc..
Not only had Elaine bought the laptop I recommended, she recommended Sony to several other people some of whom also bought.
Elaine resolved to never buy another Sony product ever again. .....This is where the story gets interesting from a marketing standpoint. Every time I suggest buying a new product that happens to be Sony, I get brow beaten to death. Elaine also tells anyone that will listen that she'll never buy a Sony product again. The result of all this Sony dogma is that I haven't bought another Sony product since Elaine's laptop failed two years ago.
It's a real shame for Sony too. We are both in the information technology industry and to say we are heavy consumers of technology would be an understatement. To give you some insight, Elaine is willingly accompanying me to CES this January for the second time since we've been going out, and both trips were personal and had nothing to do with our jobs. I believe we are the ideal consumers for an electronics company...early adopters who generally get asked by our friends, both male and female, what models of popular electronics they should buy.
We really aren't gamers (except for Elaine's new for an early Christmas present Nintendo Wii). However, tonight I told Elaine that I wanted to get a Sony PS3 because after comparison shopping, it looks like a very credible Blueray player that will be easily upgradable for some time to come. The first words out of Elaine's mouth were: "I am not paying for that." I would have never thought to ask her to contribute to my pursuit of 1080p (Blueray resolution), but she went on breathing Sony fire and damnation for several minutes more.
Effectively because Sony had no concept of how connected Elaine was to so many tech consumers, Sony screwed themselves by not fixing a known defect with Elaine's laptop. She can't help but badger me into not buying their products which compelled me to write this blog entry as an interesting marketing issue.
This story begins before the heavy use of the type of social media that will now see this story go from my marketing blog to my Twitter account and then on to my Facebook account automatically.
From a new marketing angle, this story made me think of two principles:
1. The Perpetual Profile - Businesses don't spend enough time profiling customers after they buy. We know we want them to buy again, so if they spend a few thousand dollars with us, shouldn't we figure out who they are? Elaine is a Technology Development VP, spent $2,000 on our laptop and lives with Ken who loves(ed) Sony. Perpetually profiling people who spend bigger dollars with us would be a necessary step to realize the theoretical lifetime value we all strive to achieve.
2. Poor Product Support Judgement Calls in the Social Era will Kill Brands - Effectively, some unimpowered support rep in the bowels of Sony effectively ruined my lifetime relationship and value for Sony and I am not even the one that had the direct issue.
Both these points speak to the need to get much smarter about how we deal with our customers and increasingly the web of people they influence and those who influence them. The good news is that for the products we like, we will give away this information freely. Everything Sony needed to know to alert them, perhaps electronically, that screwing up this issue would be a costly landmine for them was there for the taking.
Sony, I think you lost your opportunity to be our One and Only, but maybe there's still hope to get your act together and save a few more people like me.
The lesson for most companies is that your installed base matters. In fact they are the engine of your growth which is now amplified positively and negatively in the social era. Fail to identify or ignore those who have been your biggest or most loyal customers and deeply suffer the consequences. We used to say that those who had a bad experience told 10 others. This may be a more modern case, but I think it is the shape of things to come. So we are going to have to revise the phrase.
People who know people who've had a bad experience tell thousands of others. (via social media).
I felt horrible about it. My family has been life long Sony bigots. Our first color TV was a Sony and we've had a strong preference for Sony products ever since including desktops, laptops, DVD players, stereos, Walkmen, clock radios, etc..
Not only had Elaine bought the laptop I recommended, she recommended Sony to several other people some of whom also bought.
Elaine resolved to never buy another Sony product ever again. .....This is where the story gets interesting from a marketing standpoint. Every time I suggest buying a new product that happens to be Sony, I get brow beaten to death. Elaine also tells anyone that will listen that she'll never buy a Sony product again. The result of all this Sony dogma is that I haven't bought another Sony product since Elaine's laptop failed two years ago.
It's a real shame for Sony too. We are both in the information technology industry and to say we are heavy consumers of technology would be an understatement. To give you some insight, Elaine is willingly accompanying me to CES this January for the second time since we've been going out, and both trips were personal and had nothing to do with our jobs. I believe we are the ideal consumers for an electronics company...early adopters who generally get asked by our friends, both male and female, what models of popular electronics they should buy.
We really aren't gamers (except for Elaine's new for an early Christmas present Nintendo Wii). However, tonight I told Elaine that I wanted to get a Sony PS3 because after comparison shopping, it looks like a very credible Blueray player that will be easily upgradable for some time to come. The first words out of Elaine's mouth were: "I am not paying for that." I would have never thought to ask her to contribute to my pursuit of 1080p (Blueray resolution), but she went on breathing Sony fire and damnation for several minutes more.
Effectively because Sony had no concept of how connected Elaine was to so many tech consumers, Sony screwed themselves by not fixing a known defect with Elaine's laptop. She can't help but badger me into not buying their products which compelled me to write this blog entry as an interesting marketing issue.
This story begins before the heavy use of the type of social media that will now see this story go from my marketing blog to my Twitter account and then on to my Facebook account automatically.
From a new marketing angle, this story made me think of two principles:
1. The Perpetual Profile - Businesses don't spend enough time profiling customers after they buy. We know we want them to buy again, so if they spend a few thousand dollars with us, shouldn't we figure out who they are? Elaine is a Technology Development VP, spent $2,000 on our laptop and lives with Ken who loves(ed) Sony. Perpetually profiling people who spend bigger dollars with us would be a necessary step to realize the theoretical lifetime value we all strive to achieve.
2. Poor Product Support Judgement Calls in the Social Era will Kill Brands - Effectively, some unimpowered support rep in the bowels of Sony effectively ruined my lifetime relationship and value for Sony and I am not even the one that had the direct issue.
Both these points speak to the need to get much smarter about how we deal with our customers and increasingly the web of people they influence and those who influence them. The good news is that for the products we like, we will give away this information freely. Everything Sony needed to know to alert them, perhaps electronically, that screwing up this issue would be a costly landmine for them was there for the taking.
Sony, I think you lost your opportunity to be our One and Only, but maybe there's still hope to get your act together and save a few more people like me.
The lesson for most companies is that your installed base matters. In fact they are the engine of your growth which is now amplified positively and negatively in the social era. Fail to identify or ignore those who have been your biggest or most loyal customers and deeply suffer the consequences. We used to say that those who had a bad experience told 10 others. This may be a more modern case, but I think it is the shape of things to come. So we are going to have to revise the phrase.
People who know people who've had a bad experience tell thousands of others. (via social media).
The good news, Sony, is that there is a short window to learn from your mistakes. The reverberating effect of Social Media is well documented, but its impact is really just revving up. Act fast and my second LCD TV may not be another Samsung.
This is How We Do It: Social Media at Oracle
Hey. Here's an interview I just did at Oracle OpenWorld 09 on our social media efforts at Oracle. Just advance the stream to about 31 minutes and 20 seconds.
When Reality Does Not Meet Hype: AT&T + iPhone Probably the Worst Customer Experience I've Ever Had
I know we are all supposed to love these little slippery shiny plastic boxes specifically engineered to drop out of you hand, with batteries and memory that can't be upgraded giving you yet another reason to pay Apple more money.
I've resisted for some time. I was actually given one that I gave away without using it as it didn't have the features I use most often, notably MMS and Bluetooth Stereo. When the newest one launched, I did a bit of research online and decided I'd take the plunge despite my issues with its purposely designed obsolescence.
Unfortunately the experience of trying to get one ordered and working has probably been the worst consumer experience I have ever suffered through. The commercials make it look so easy, and I was actually looking forward to the experience. I had no idea how far from reality the actual consumer experience is.
When the 3Gs came out, I didn't try to rush out and get one. I waited a couple of weeks for the early hiccups to work themselves out and inventory to be replenished. I guess I didn't wait long enough.
About a week ago, I went to an AT&T store in the heart of the financial district of San Francisco. They didn't have any and directed me to the Apple store, but said that only a couple of people they sent there had been successful in getting one.
I decided to order one online through my company. The first order failed for some strange reason after I submitted it through the AT&T Premier site. After calling my bank to make sure I wasn't charged, I processed the order again. It launched a workflow inside my company that showed that service for the year would be almost $1,000. That really is a lot of money, but I use a cell phone a lot for work and also need to demo some of the applications the development group I work with has built for the iPhone.
The phone arrived on Friday. I've been an AT&T customer for many years so this was an upgrade. I was supposed to call a number to process the order. The recording told me that the automatic processing system was down. I waited on hold 30 minutes, and hour, and 30 minutes again and never got through. The last time, AT&T simply hung up. The next time I called they said the "Premier" support would not be open until Monday. One more call dumped me into a voicemail system. I gave up and decided to go to the Apple store.
A portly guy in a giant orange T-shirt with those oversized earings that permanently distort your ear lobes insists that to activate the phone, I just needed to plug it into iTunes. I knew this was rubbish so I pressed some more. "Oh activation, for that you need to go to the AT&T store. I don't know what their hours are though."
I trundle down to the AT&T Store and of course it is closed. I give up and decide I will return the next morning to see what they can do.
At the AT&T store, another forcefully insistent but clearly ignorant employee tells me I need to take the sim card out of my existing phone and put it in the new iPhone. He is adamant that there is no sim card in the new phone. I tell him that certainly AT&T ships a sim card in a phone they are upgrading. He pops it open and out drops a sim card. Having now splayed my phone open, he reassembles it and attempts to activate on his system. He then tells me this is a "Premier" account and thus he can't do anything. I ask him if he can return the phone. Yes, as it turns out, that is the one thing he can do and in this matter he actually seemed eager to help.
I left with my now 24 hour old brick resolving to give up until Monday for another hour or more on the phone.
It is very clear that this undynamic duo needs a little remedial marketing.....
EXPECTATION - Don't set the bar ridiculously high in your ads and commercials if your process is shit. Under promise and try to over deliver.
ALERT SALES - It's in excusable after 3 releases of the product that probably one of the most heavily trafficked Apple stores in the heart of San Francisco doesn't know the process for activating a phone or the hours of the AT&T Store.
SEGMENTATION - "Premier" should not mean an invitation to traipse around San Francisco or climb through the phone tree to get crapped on. I work at one of the largest companies in the world. We spend a lot on voice and data communications because these services are vital to our business. We do have choices though at the employee level and guess what we talk...and blog. We want our company to get good value and we want good service ourselves. It's not a surprise that Apple is blowing it in the corporate market, but AT&T? You should really be ashamed of yourselves. I suggest you work on making Premier actually Premier. And Apple, come on. Even if you think it is cool to ignore the corporate market, at least you could recognize that if the iPhone is the supposed gateway drug to your other products, and someone buys the most expensive version of that product, they probably expect a decent introduction to your world.
EAT HUMBLE PIE - At both stores I sensed a great degree of smugness. Employees who insisted they knew what they were doing when they didn't have a clue. It's very clear this partnership on its third try still has many issues. When I tell you I've been on hold for more than two hours don't brashly insist that you know how to fix my problem only to send me away with nothing. Perhaps this goes back to expectation, but you can't just hire a guy with a bone through his earlobe to show the world you are different you actually have to be different.
It's takes a lot for me to sprint home two miles from the center of San Francisco to crank out such a blog entry. I am way beyond irritated with the myriad of incompetent processes and people I have encountered at this point.
I can assure you, that the only thing that will keep me from talking about this pathetic display forever will be an act of service recovery befitting the crime of the time I've been forced to waste. Apple & AT&T, if someone in your headquarters is listening, unlike your employees in your stores, I plan to waste just one more hour on Monday trying to get this phone to work. After which I will take advantage of evidently the only thing you have collectively (and oddly) mastered - the process of giving my money back.
The Extra Hurdle for Marketing Through Social Media: You Gotta Make 'em Feel
So we've been chatting recently with a vendor, Corporate Visions. They follow the
approach that a message that sticks is one that's wrapped in emotion. It's amazing to see when this technique is executed well. This video that a friend pointed me to is not new new, in fact 150k plus people have already seen it. But I think the folks at Grasshopper.com (actually the agency they hired) really nailed this approach.
It's interesting to note how intertwined the notion of making a message stick, something good salespeople have known how to do forever, and our expectations associated with new and social media.
Clearly we all want to feel something, and we all have very high expectations of social media in this regard. I think this notion is perhaps an extension of my last post, The Importance of Being Earnest.
So....I now have a request.
Please add comments to this blog with links to messages that you think were made to stick - messages wrapped in emotion. I wanna see what you got.
Go ahead, try to make me cry.... or laugh. Actually, I have a strong preference for laughing.
The Importance of Being Earnest in Social Media; or What Facebook and Twitter Should Do to Save Themselves from Becoming Irrelevant
So who hates their personal e-mail inbox? I do! Yahoo has just become complete spam. I have maxed out the number of filters on the paid account, tagged every possible item that even remotely looks like spam as spam and yet it keeps coming.
According to KGB.com 183 Billion e-mail messages are sent per day. I would give them a shout out, but it looks like this number is from 2007. Also they didn't give me an answer to the second half of my question for my 99 cent text message investment which was - how much of this is spam? Maybe the KGB just doesn't know. Afterall, they lost some of their best spooks to capitalism after the iron curtain fell.
Well wikipedia does and it is free! Wikipedia led me to this reference from the New York Times. Spamalot? Why yes we do. 94% of the time as it turns out. So approximately 2,000,000 e-mail messages are sent every second of every day and 1,880,000 are pure crap that we don't want.
My financee's brother actually works at the post office. He told me that the only thing that is really keeping them alive is junk mail. In fact, like e-mail it is the bulk of what they move these days. I got on the USPS' marketers spam list and they send me all sorts of paper materials telling me how green they are. They actually sent me a large express mail envelope to tell me they weren't going to be sending me the T-shirt they offered me. That they sent later in another large package, in the wrong size of course. Forget about solar power and hydrogen cars. It seems the greenist thing the US Government could do is close the Post Office. (Sorry future brother-in-law. I'll help you bounce pack with a new startup that sells spam filters on late night infomercials using Swedish models that austensibly made the stuff...oops that one has been done Remind me to stop staying up to watch Craig Ferguson.)
So where am I going with this? Well the Post Office is dying a slow death at a rate of one cent price hikes a year and service cutbacks until we all give up. E-mail is almost dead on arrival. Myspace and Friendster lost their mojo before they even tried to stretch to reach my demographic. What do they all have in common? They are filled with crap!
Recently I've been experimenting with feeding content to Twitter. (see The Need for Feed). I am trying to use the technique for good - serving up interesting data sources that people can actually use. I have become painfully aware of the potential to use these techniques for evil though. Last week two guys I went to high school with both crapped in the walled garden that is supposed to be my Facebook account on the same day. They both posted some BS about this new energy drink called efusjon. It's a multi-level marketing company selling some acai berry sugar water. Supposed to save your life not just dangerously elevate your sugar levels and rot your teeth. Apparently part of their "viral" marketing was to get some dudes from my high school to spam me with their fake musings about this garbage.
There you have it. The beginning of the end. One day you'll nod knowingly when your using Farcebluch.com instead.
Attention all entrepreneurs of Silicon Valley - this is your shining opportunity. Build us a social communication platform that keeps this crap out! Of course we need to buy things to keep whatever it is we are talking about afloat, but can't you at least try to address our interests? If Facebook did this they would know that the only acai berry I consume is made into Pinkberry style frozen yogurt. That's unrealistically specific for the time being, but you get my point.
So what does it mean to be earnest in Social media? It means making a college try to be relevant. Sure we can't all possibly keep up with the information demands of the hungry new communication mediums alone, but we have to try to keep content flowing that is at least interesting to our audience.
I am going to offer up The Cocktail Party Rule for Social Media.
If it is not a reasonable leap from the context or the topic in a group chat at a cocktail party, don't go there.
I send a link to this blog to our corporate Twitter account. I work at Oracle Corporation and market our CRM solutions. I think it is a reasonable leap that someone interested in CRM may be wrestling with the same new marketing concepts I blog about.
On the other hand, if a group of guys is gathered around the punch bowl, Mojito vat, beer tub, or Franzia box (depending on what kind of cocktail party you are having) talking about whether the Palm Pre has a snowball's chance in hell of tarnishing Apple's shine, you don't bring up the fact that your wife, the tennis coach just started selling some acai berry fizzy water out of her trunk.
It's a nonsequitor and it is annoying. It's worse than annoying in fact. It's that feeling of trepidation every time you open up your Yahoo inbox or your mailbox for that matter.
So what does this all mean? The power is in your hands. It's in all of our hands. Just use the The Cocktail Party Rule for Social Media and we'll all be fine, and we won't stop having to change communication mediums every 6-12 months. ....or will we?
See you on Farcebluch.
According to KGB.com 183 Billion e-mail messages are sent per day. I would give them a shout out, but it looks like this number is from 2007. Also they didn't give me an answer to the second half of my question for my 99 cent text message investment which was - how much of this is spam? Maybe the KGB just doesn't know. Afterall, they lost some of their best spooks to capitalism after the iron curtain fell.
Well wikipedia does and it is free! Wikipedia led me to this reference from the New York Times. Spamalot? Why yes we do. 94% of the time as it turns out. So approximately 2,000,000 e-mail messages are sent every second of every day and 1,880,000 are pure crap that we don't want.
My financee's brother actually works at the post office. He told me that the only thing that is really keeping them alive is junk mail. In fact, like e-mail it is the bulk of what they move these days. I got on the USPS' marketers spam list and they send me all sorts of paper materials telling me how green they are. They actually sent me a large express mail envelope to tell me they weren't going to be sending me the T-shirt they offered me. That they sent later in another large package, in the wrong size of course. Forget about solar power and hydrogen cars. It seems the greenist thing the US Government could do is close the Post Office. (Sorry future brother-in-law. I'll help you bounce pack with a new startup that sells spam filters on late night infomercials using Swedish models that austensibly made the stuff...oops that one has been done Remind me to stop staying up to watch Craig Ferguson.)
So where am I going with this? Well the Post Office is dying a slow death at a rate of one cent price hikes a year and service cutbacks until we all give up. E-mail is almost dead on arrival. Myspace and Friendster lost their mojo before they even tried to stretch to reach my demographic. What do they all have in common? They are filled with crap!
Recently I've been experimenting with feeding content to Twitter. (see The Need for Feed). I am trying to use the technique for good - serving up interesting data sources that people can actually use. I have become painfully aware of the potential to use these techniques for evil though. Last week two guys I went to high school with both crapped in the walled garden that is supposed to be my Facebook account on the same day. They both posted some BS about this new energy drink called efusjon. It's a multi-level marketing company selling some acai berry sugar water. Supposed to save your life not just dangerously elevate your sugar levels and rot your teeth. Apparently part of their "viral" marketing was to get some dudes from my high school to spam me with their fake musings about this garbage.
There you have it. The beginning of the end. One day you'll nod knowingly when your using Farcebluch.com instead.
Attention all entrepreneurs of Silicon Valley - this is your shining opportunity. Build us a social communication platform that keeps this crap out! Of course we need to buy things to keep whatever it is we are talking about afloat, but can't you at least try to address our interests? If Facebook did this they would know that the only acai berry I consume is made into Pinkberry style frozen yogurt. That's unrealistically specific for the time being, but you get my point.
So what does it mean to be earnest in Social media? It means making a college try to be relevant. Sure we can't all possibly keep up with the information demands of the hungry new communication mediums alone, but we have to try to keep content flowing that is at least interesting to our audience.
I am going to offer up The Cocktail Party Rule for Social Media.
If it is not a reasonable leap from the context or the topic in a group chat at a cocktail party, don't go there.
I send a link to this blog to our corporate Twitter account. I work at Oracle Corporation and market our CRM solutions. I think it is a reasonable leap that someone interested in CRM may be wrestling with the same new marketing concepts I blog about.
On the other hand, if a group of guys is gathered around the punch bowl, Mojito vat, beer tub, or Franzia box (depending on what kind of cocktail party you are having) talking about whether the Palm Pre has a snowball's chance in hell of tarnishing Apple's shine, you don't bring up the fact that your wife, the tennis coach just started selling some acai berry fizzy water out of her trunk.
It's a nonsequitor and it is annoying. It's worse than annoying in fact. It's that feeling of trepidation every time you open up your Yahoo inbox or your mailbox for that matter.
So what does this all mean? The power is in your hands. It's in all of our hands. Just use the The Cocktail Party Rule for Social Media and we'll all be fine, and we won't stop having to change communication mediums every 6-12 months. ....or will we?
See you on Farcebluch.
The Need for Feed: RSS & Twitter, Why They May be Like Peanut Butter and Jelly
The challenge with all things social media is keeping them up-to-date. Blogs can be a serious drain as they beg for content like Audrey in 'Little Shop of Horrors.' If you are using Twitter to communicate with your network and push relevant content, you may be experiencing the same thing. Even keeping up with 140 character posts can be a grind.
Recently, I've started experimenting with pushing some of the content that I feel is most relevant to the people I interact with as well as the public at large. It's been fun to watch the reactions and the results.
http://www.twitter.com/topcrmbloggers is a feed I set up that aggregates what I consider to be the best CRM Bloggers out there. You'll note that I have 33 followers in just a week without even trying. The feed of this twitter handle in turn feeds one of our Netvibes pages. Entropy yes, but we are serving up content at different potential access points for different users.
I also set up a fun feed of Odd News which I love to read while on the bus. It started on @pulverman on Twitter and is now featured on @OddNewsNetwork. @pulverman will now be an aggregation of the top Marketing 2.0 blogs starting tomorrow as well as my shorter musings on the world of Marketing 2.0. From the same feed as OddNewsNetwork I select one post at random once a day and feed my personal Twitter feed, @bolobao. This in turn updates Facebook providing a bit of fun for friends to see and comment on.
On slow news days, I know that at least the feeds I've set up are keeping various sites up-to-date with interesting content.
These are early days in my feed experiments, but I imagine marketers everywhere are struggling with these same issues.
Like a good blog post, I think in the final analysis, what you chose to feed to your social marketing efforts like what you post on your blog will be judged on relevance. If it is relevant - aggregated feeds crafted with the love and personality you apply to a post - it will be appreciated.
I'll no doubt keep tuning my feeds to make them ever more relevant and interesting. I just sent my Yelp reviews to my personal Twitter (@bolobao) and our Delicious posts (www.delicious.com/OracleCRM) to our work Twitter account (@OracleCRM). Perhaps RSS and Twitter aren't quite as cozy at PB&J yet, but I would like to submit that we all have the need for feed, even newspapers, making this combo perhaps your own personal Associated Press.
Recently, I've started experimenting with pushing some of the content that I feel is most relevant to the people I interact with as well as the public at large. It's been fun to watch the reactions and the results.
http://www.twitter.com/topcrmbloggers is a feed I set up that aggregates what I consider to be the best CRM Bloggers out there. You'll note that I have 33 followers in just a week without even trying. The feed of this twitter handle in turn feeds one of our Netvibes pages. Entropy yes, but we are serving up content at different potential access points for different users.
I also set up a fun feed of Odd News which I love to read while on the bus. It started on @pulverman on Twitter and is now featured on @OddNewsNetwork. @pulverman will now be an aggregation of the top Marketing 2.0 blogs starting tomorrow as well as my shorter musings on the world of Marketing 2.0. From the same feed as OddNewsNetwork I select one post at random once a day and feed my personal Twitter feed, @bolobao. This in turn updates Facebook providing a bit of fun for friends to see and comment on.
On slow news days, I know that at least the feeds I've set up are keeping various sites up-to-date with interesting content.
These are early days in my feed experiments, but I imagine marketers everywhere are struggling with these same issues.
Like a good blog post, I think in the final analysis, what you chose to feed to your social marketing efforts like what you post on your blog will be judged on relevance. If it is relevant - aggregated feeds crafted with the love and personality you apply to a post - it will be appreciated.
I'll no doubt keep tuning my feeds to make them ever more relevant and interesting. I just sent my Yelp reviews to my personal Twitter (@bolobao) and our Delicious posts (www.delicious.com/OracleCRM) to our work Twitter account (@OracleCRM). Perhaps RSS and Twitter aren't quite as cozy at PB&J yet, but I would like to submit that we all have the need for feed, even newspapers, making this combo perhaps your own personal Associated Press.
The Unicorn Factor @ The Twitter Conference
140, The Twitter Conference just ended - a conference focused on the tools and trends of the real time web . We were there to see what we could leverage immediately in our marketing efforts. One of the presenters revealed the perfect quote originally served up as a tweet to sum up much of the content at events like this - 'All Unicorn, No Cupcake.' We got some Cupcake nonetheless, taking away a few gems.
Here's a fun fact from the conference. Did you know that there are now 10 thousand apps leveraging the Twitter API? Lots of these utilities and their founders made an appearance at the show. Very inspirational. Literally one guy not in a garage, but living above the garage in many cases. The guy next to me today had a very cool venture going that he was driving in his free time when he is not working at an mid-west farm equipment manufacturer. Seeing the entrepreneurial energy and the great utilities in progress is clearly not the source of my comment above, as I think many of these folks are delivering real Cupcake.
The Unicorn part of the reference relates more to some of the panelist consultants, conference groupies, and technology observers. No point calling him out here, but a well known social media observer told the audience that people are just going to need to get better at creating filters . Pure Unicorn. This from a guy who has 5 computers to geek out with wallstreet style while tracking the social web. Can you imagine joe six pack trying to promote his lawn fertilizer business with the same rig? Absolutely not.
There was also a ton navel gazing musings on the future from the panel jockies who aren't sure if they put the clothes in the dryer before boarding the flight to Mountain View. The exception to this was was Jason Calacanis who gave an excellent view of the likely future of Twitter and the real time web complete with possible screen mockups. He offered real justifications and potential business models for what he proposed. The rule, was unfortunately the folks from Twitter by providing just vague notions of where they are headed and really demonstrating for all that the business that they created has clearly gotten away from them.
In the battle of Cupcake vs. Unicorns though, Cupcake did win out in the passion and brilliant ideas of the developers that showed their wares. Search, analytics, collaboration, etc. The Unicorns occasionally offered value too when they pointed to the best of these utilities like Twitrratr.com, an elegant and simple way check the sentiment of posts for your brand.
Bottom line. The real time web is here. Time for all marketers to figure it out. Time spent waiting to figure out if Twitter is going to make it or come up with a business model is time wasted. The notion of needing to make sense of real time data from customers, employees, friends and enemies not to mention your car, house, and maybe even a pet or two is happening whether we like the notion or not. Learning to converse in this new world takes time, so it is best to start now.
I guarantee there will be a real time web solution without the need for a frequent Fail Whale in our near future. True, the utilities out there are numerous, sometimes shaky betas, and arguably all features vs. complete applications. Having said that, there are a lot of brilliant ideas to get your head around like location centric twittering, real time integrations with enterprise apps, and tweets that are automatically triggered and trigger other social interactions automatically. whew.
My advice for businesses......chances are your Twitter "phone" is already ringing. Answer it and begin unravelling how to leverage the Real Time web for your company.
First assignment - figure out what a # tag is and peruse the details from this Twitter conference using the tag #140tc. I'll let you apply your own Cupcake filter.
Here's a fun fact from the conference. Did you know that there are now 10 thousand apps leveraging the Twitter API? Lots of these utilities and their founders made an appearance at the show. Very inspirational. Literally one guy not in a garage, but living above the garage in many cases. The guy next to me today had a very cool venture going that he was driving in his free time when he is not working at an mid-west farm equipment manufacturer. Seeing the entrepreneurial energy and the great utilities in progress is clearly not the source of my comment above, as I think many of these folks are delivering real Cupcake.
The Unicorn part of the reference relates more to some of the panelist consultants, conference groupies, and technology observers. No point calling him out here, but a well known social media observer told the audience that people are just going to need to get better at creating filters . Pure Unicorn. This from a guy who has 5 computers to geek out with wallstreet style while tracking the social web. Can you imagine joe six pack trying to promote his lawn fertilizer business with the same rig? Absolutely not.
There was also a ton navel gazing musings on the future from the panel jockies who aren't sure if they put the clothes in the dryer before boarding the flight to Mountain View. The exception to this was was Jason Calacanis who gave an excellent view of the likely future of Twitter and the real time web complete with possible screen mockups. He offered real justifications and potential business models for what he proposed. The rule, was unfortunately the folks from Twitter by providing just vague notions of where they are headed and really demonstrating for all that the business that they created has clearly gotten away from them.
In the battle of Cupcake vs. Unicorns though, Cupcake did win out in the passion and brilliant ideas of the developers that showed their wares. Search, analytics, collaboration, etc. The Unicorns occasionally offered value too when they pointed to the best of these utilities like Twitrratr.com, an elegant and simple way check the sentiment of posts for your brand.
Bottom line. The real time web is here. Time for all marketers to figure it out. Time spent waiting to figure out if Twitter is going to make it or come up with a business model is time wasted. The notion of needing to make sense of real time data from customers, employees, friends and enemies not to mention your car, house, and maybe even a pet or two is happening whether we like the notion or not. Learning to converse in this new world takes time, so it is best to start now.
I guarantee there will be a real time web solution without the need for a frequent Fail Whale in our near future. True, the utilities out there are numerous, sometimes shaky betas, and arguably all features vs. complete applications. Having said that, there are a lot of brilliant ideas to get your head around like location centric twittering, real time integrations with enterprise apps, and tweets that are automatically triggered and trigger other social interactions automatically. whew.
My advice for businesses......chances are your Twitter "phone" is already ringing. Answer it and begin unravelling how to leverage the Real Time web for your company.
First assignment - figure out what a # tag is and peruse the details from this Twitter conference using the tag #140tc. I'll let you apply your own Cupcake filter.
Talking Chalk at Web 2.0 Expo 2008
So what have I been up to recently on the blog front...experimenting with what I hope is more engaging content. Here's my first attempt using slideshare.net to record my chalk talk at Web 2.0 Expo 2008.
Bye Baidu, Google?
Did you really think there was going to be just one newspaper replacement for the web?
Nope, but they seemed to have a smokin' first mover advantage. They absolutely did. Viral, clean, elegant and great results. Like any great software institution, feature clutter, the continuous ebb and flow of fickle user interest, and people getting fat and happy off of their options gets the better of most of Silicon Valley's break aways over time. And Wall Street oh Wall Street, "do I no longer please you?" It happens to everyone, GOOG. What would financial markets be without new starlets all the time. Irrational exuberance and rational pragmatism - two cousins that hate each other, but absolutely can't live without one another.
Will Google be a big part of the web experience for some time? Sure they will. Will they be the gravitational center? Unlikely.
Take a look at this quick comparison of page views.
Nope, but they seemed to have a smokin' first mover advantage. They absolutely did. Viral, clean, elegant and great results. Like any great software institution, feature clutter, the continuous ebb and flow of fickle user interest, and people getting fat and happy off of their options gets the better of most of Silicon Valley's break aways over time. And Wall Street oh Wall Street, "do I no longer please you?" It happens to everyone, GOOG. What would financial markets be without new starlets all the time. Irrational exuberance and rational pragmatism - two cousins that hate each other, but absolutely can't live without one another.
Will Google be a big part of the web experience for some time? Sure they will. Will they be the gravitational center? Unlikely.
Take a look at this quick comparison of page views.
While there are hundreds of ways to poke at this, I am going to just keep it simple. Look at what has happened to Baidu and look at the other three. Clearly the concept of where and how you find content is changing. Search is adding context - friends, dating, maps, encyclopedia topics, video and a whole Yelp more. Google can certainly try to keep on top of all these trends, but it is a losing battle. No one company is going to own all or even most of the web search behavior of human beings because search as it turns out is actually just an attribute of other behaviors.
Google is a learning organization, however. They saw this coming years ago. Their strategy of offering advertisers a bundle of possible advertising methods is a winner and the next real battle front in web advertising. Microsoft clearly sees this. Anybody else? Baidu?
/*
A Little Fun with Truth in Advertising
Just for fun....here's a few great examples of just how far Photoshop can stretch the truth....
http://www.bspcn.com/2008/02/12/top-40-photoshopped-images/
http://www.bspcn.com/2008/02/12/top-40-photoshopped-images/
Espousing Pithiness
So you ask, what have you been doing? You haven’t written a blog entry in a long time? Well while living the dream of thinking big Marketing 2.0 thoughts and driving the corresponding actions, I started to question the value of a blog. Oh yes, it’s there, but I think the format of mine and others needs to change. We are all super time starved, and I think lengthy musings just don’t do it for folks. However, at the same time I was questioning the nature of business blogging, my small readership was coming out of the woodwork to question why I hadn’t written in a while. My most current opinion is that I need to keep it short for my sanity and yours. With that said, I am going to completely violate that today as I am going to show you right here a couple of the things I’ve been up to since the last post.
First of all, I’ve been working on a website that will be a companion piece to this blog (indeed the blog is embedded in it) to capture resource links and threads to the points we discuss here. In the next week or so, I’ll be transferring a lot of the Marketing 2.0 resources I assembled for an internal corporate audience to this public space.
Here’s what it looks like (built with the new beta release of Netvibes).
This next item is impossible to read and Blogger's upload converted me to a member of the Blue Man Group. So dear reader(s), if you are up on the latest file posting techniques for blogs, let me know. Google Docs wanted this in HTML and it looked pretty bad though not as bad as what you see below. It’s a paper a wrote that will appear in a publication called Perform that is published by the same folks that run the magazine, Revenue Today. Anyway – some thoughts on why I believe web 2.0 is actually supporting very old behaviors for how we buy and sell not new ones. If you are interested, e-mail me, and I’ll send you a copy.
All for this addition. Shorter and pithier next time. Promise.
First of all, I’ve been working on a website that will be a companion piece to this blog (indeed the blog is embedded in it) to capture resource links and threads to the points we discuss here. In the next week or so, I’ll be transferring a lot of the Marketing 2.0 resources I assembled for an internal corporate audience to this public space.
Here’s what it looks like (built with the new beta release of Netvibes).
This next item is impossible to read and Blogger's upload converted me to a member of the Blue Man Group. So dear reader(s), if you are up on the latest file posting techniques for blogs, let me know. Google Docs wanted this in HTML and it looked pretty bad though not as bad as what you see below. It’s a paper a wrote that will appear in a publication called Perform that is published by the same folks that run the magazine, Revenue Today. Anyway – some thoughts on why I believe web 2.0 is actually supporting very old behaviors for how we buy and sell not new ones. If you are interested, e-mail me, and I’ll send you a copy.
All for this addition. Shorter and pithier next time. Promise.
The Battle for Relevance Rages On
I’m following up my opening rant with some news from the front. There were two very interesting developments in the battle for your attention this week that play exactly in to what I waxed on about last week.
First of all, the offensive move. ThePudding.com made some fanfare in the news this week. Their new solution offers people the opportunity to make calls over the Internet for free if you don’t mind big brother listening in and attempting to serve you relevant ads at the same time. Early reviews are that the creep factor is more funny than creepy as a computer tries to pick out key words of wisdom from your blather and serve up ads that pertain to what you are wrapping about. I’ve signed up for the beta, so as soon as they let me in, I’ll be able to tell you more from a first hand perspective.
The interesting thing about ThePudding, is not what they are, but what they might be. They don’t plan to be a consumer-facing site in the medium term, but rather an offering for companies that provide voIP/ Internet telephony solutions. Free calls may soon be coming to Skype, Yahoo and others via a Pudding back end that enables these companies to make enough from advertising to more than cover the costs of Ma Bell’s connection charges and the thickened chocolate milk that makes it all possible. So are you willing to let a computer eavesdrop if its owner promises not to store anything you’ve said? These guys are hoping ThePudding is sweet enough to convince you to do so.
Next, the defensive move. If you tuned into NPR’s On the Media on Sunday, you were treated to a great story on Ad Block Plus, a plug in for Firefox that blocks almost all the ads you see while surfing the Internet. This one I did get to try. It works so well it is scary. Why scary? You can just imagine an advertising World War III where advertisers come up with ever more ingenious ways to serve us ads while an underground resistance figures out ways to block every new approach. The problem I foresee is that we are going to be the innocent civilians caught in the middle of this crossfire.
Ad Block Plus works by keeping a list of all of the sites that serve ads to websites and blocks those feeds, much like a virus list. Virus is an apt analogy for at least 3/4ths of the stuff I see. The folk at Internet hegemon, Google, must be seriously pissed. You buy DoubleClick for a king’s ransom as part of your attempt to sew up the entire digital marketing landscape and some joker with a .org figures out a way to block your ad feed. Sure, you can sue him to the center of the earth, but the cat is now out of the bag.
In the On the Media show, The NPR crew broached the topic of whether or not blocking ads was a form of stealing. The logic went that it costs real money to serve up these sites. If you block off their revenue source, you are essentially taking something for free – their offering – be it news, maps, reviews, or e-mail. On the surface, I agree that we do have a real problem if we bite the Internet hands that feed us. On the other hand, I’ve had to look at the same horribly annoying flashing low interest rate banner above my Yahoo e-mail inbox for the better part of a year. Yahoo must be so proud of themselves knowing that I have a mortgage. Now if they just knew when it was time for me to refinance or how unlikely I was to click on a chartreuse banner that looks like it was designed by some ex-used car salesmen. Part of me says it serves them right. Violate our trust long enough and if we are given a way to opt out, we do. Just ask the churn department at your wireless carrier.
This particular battle will be fascinating to watch. I predict détente will come in the form of permission-based marketing on sites we frequent fueled by a whole series of new companies that get much much better at behavioral targeting. Truly relevant ads? What a novel idea. It’s so novel, it’s novious.
First of all, the offensive move. ThePudding.com made some fanfare in the news this week. Their new solution offers people the opportunity to make calls over the Internet for free if you don’t mind big brother listening in and attempting to serve you relevant ads at the same time. Early reviews are that the creep factor is more funny than creepy as a computer tries to pick out key words of wisdom from your blather and serve up ads that pertain to what you are wrapping about. I’ve signed up for the beta, so as soon as they let me in, I’ll be able to tell you more from a first hand perspective.
The interesting thing about ThePudding, is not what they are, but what they might be. They don’t plan to be a consumer-facing site in the medium term, but rather an offering for companies that provide voIP/ Internet telephony solutions. Free calls may soon be coming to Skype, Yahoo and others via a Pudding back end that enables these companies to make enough from advertising to more than cover the costs of Ma Bell’s connection charges and the thickened chocolate milk that makes it all possible. So are you willing to let a computer eavesdrop if its owner promises not to store anything you’ve said? These guys are hoping ThePudding is sweet enough to convince you to do so.
Next, the defensive move. If you tuned into NPR’s On the Media on Sunday, you were treated to a great story on Ad Block Plus, a plug in for Firefox that blocks almost all the ads you see while surfing the Internet. This one I did get to try. It works so well it is scary. Why scary? You can just imagine an advertising World War III where advertisers come up with ever more ingenious ways to serve us ads while an underground resistance figures out ways to block every new approach. The problem I foresee is that we are going to be the innocent civilians caught in the middle of this crossfire.
Ad Block Plus works by keeping a list of all of the sites that serve ads to websites and blocks those feeds, much like a virus list. Virus is an apt analogy for at least 3/4ths of the stuff I see. The folk at Internet hegemon, Google, must be seriously pissed. You buy DoubleClick for a king’s ransom as part of your attempt to sew up the entire digital marketing landscape and some joker with a .org figures out a way to block your ad feed. Sure, you can sue him to the center of the earth, but the cat is now out of the bag.
In the On the Media show, The NPR crew broached the topic of whether or not blocking ads was a form of stealing. The logic went that it costs real money to serve up these sites. If you block off their revenue source, you are essentially taking something for free – their offering – be it news, maps, reviews, or e-mail. On the surface, I agree that we do have a real problem if we bite the Internet hands that feed us. On the other hand, I’ve had to look at the same horribly annoying flashing low interest rate banner above my Yahoo e-mail inbox for the better part of a year. Yahoo must be so proud of themselves knowing that I have a mortgage. Now if they just knew when it was time for me to refinance or how unlikely I was to click on a chartreuse banner that looks like it was designed by some ex-used car salesmen. Part of me says it serves them right. Violate our trust long enough and if we are given a way to opt out, we do. Just ask the churn department at your wireless carrier.
This particular battle will be fascinating to watch. I predict détente will come in the form of permission-based marketing on sites we frequent fueled by a whole series of new companies that get much much better at behavioral targeting. Truly relevant ads? What a novel idea. It’s so novel, it’s novious.
Know New Marketing - What in the H are you talking about?
.....yes it's a play on words....I'm fond of those, and if we ever meet in person, or perhaps even in this blog, you'll have to endure some bad puns as well.
So what am I getting at? Well a growing number of us believe that marketing, as we currently know it, is dead. As consumers we are tired of the window dressing, snake oil, and spin. Tell us what is is, what is does, and why I should care. ...and make it quick, because I have an inbox full of spam like you wouldn't believe, or maybe you would.
Why did it die? Simple. Trust. What was that our scholar of a president tried to reiterate - Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice...and that is where he lost it, but you know what comes next.
Collectively we are sick of the junk mail, the valueless untargeted commercials, the mailbox full of crap. In our limited time on this rock, we search for meaning and purpose and there are a whole bunch of direct marketers who want to waste that precious time. We trusted you, and you burned us one too many times. Like many folks, I've moved to triage mode on the tons of messages trying to reach me. If I can figure out what it is with reasonable certainty it gets deleted or thrown out without ever being opened. I am currently looking for a shredder big enough to accept those 20 page credit card offers poorly masquerading as important courier envelopes, unopened of course.
So as you can imagine, it produces a fair bit of cognitive dissonance for me to work as a marketer. Fortunately there are a growing number of us hell bent on leveraging new marketing techniques to prove the substantial ROI of marketing.
With the democratization of all of the media channels, marketing today is about conversations. Broadcasts and monologues are so yesteryear. This blog will explore how to reach your customers, members, constituents post Marketing 1.0 through the conversations that matter to them (and guess what, its almost never going to happen on your website).
So buckle up, java down and join me in this dialogue where we will chart the course for where we go from here. The good news is that the only way is up.
So what am I getting at? Well a growing number of us believe that marketing, as we currently know it, is dead. As consumers we are tired of the window dressing, snake oil, and spin. Tell us what is is, what is does, and why I should care. ...and make it quick, because I have an inbox full of spam like you wouldn't believe, or maybe you would.
Why did it die? Simple. Trust. What was that our scholar of a president tried to reiterate - Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice...and that is where he lost it, but you know what comes next.
Collectively we are sick of the junk mail, the valueless untargeted commercials, the mailbox full of crap. In our limited time on this rock, we search for meaning and purpose and there are a whole bunch of direct marketers who want to waste that precious time. We trusted you, and you burned us one too many times. Like many folks, I've moved to triage mode on the tons of messages trying to reach me. If I can figure out what it is with reasonable certainty it gets deleted or thrown out without ever being opened. I am currently looking for a shredder big enough to accept those 20 page credit card offers poorly masquerading as important courier envelopes, unopened of course.
So as you can imagine, it produces a fair bit of cognitive dissonance for me to work as a marketer. Fortunately there are a growing number of us hell bent on leveraging new marketing techniques to prove the substantial ROI of marketing.
With the democratization of all of the media channels, marketing today is about conversations. Broadcasts and monologues are so yesteryear. This blog will explore how to reach your customers, members, constituents post Marketing 1.0 through the conversations that matter to them (and guess what, its almost never going to happen on your website).
So buckle up, java down and join me in this dialogue where we will chart the course for where we go from here. The good news is that the only way is up.