RE: Some weird phenomenons on oracle data guard physical standby on 11g?

From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:47:48 -0400
Message-ID: <1d7901d994a0$6af5c470$40e14d50$_at_rsiz.com>



real time apply, so is it even using the online redo logs on the standby? (But it ships the archived redo logs, right?)  

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Quanwen Zhao Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2023 11:35 AM
To: Andy Sayer
Cc: howard.latham_at_gmail.com; ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Some weird phenomenons on oracle data guard physical standby on 11g?  

Hi Howard and Andy :-),  

The Oracle Data Guard with Primary and Physical Standby are working well, physical standby database is real time apply redo from the primary as well as the redo log files and standby redo log files have the same size 512m whatever on primary and physical standby.  

BTW it could not change CLEARING and CURRENT to UNUSED even if I clear and drop firstly and re-add it secondly but for a while it become CLEARING or CURRENT.  

Even if I don't understand why only switch between 2 number of standby redo log files although having 11 number of standby redo log files on physical standby database, and the 10 number of redo log files have been switched amongst them on primary database.  

Best Regards

Quanwen Zhao  

Andy Sayer <andysayer_at_gmail.com> 于2023年6月1日周四 22:01写道:

Running 11g on production is a weird phenomenon.  

The important thing to know is if dataguard is working? Is it supposed to be real time apply? Is it real time applying?  

What you’ve said doesn’t raise any alarm bells with me.  

Thanks,

Andy  

On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 6:31 AM, Howard Latham <howard.latham_at_gmail.com> wrote:

Are they part of the dB. ? Are they the same size?  

On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, 14:15 Quanwen Zhao, <quanwenzhao_at_gmail.com> wrote:

Hello my oracle friends :-),  

I've found out some weird phenomenons on oracle data guard physical standby on 11g of production system on my customer.

  • The status are all showing CLEARING on 9 number of redo log files and the status is CURRENT on another redo log file (the group number is from 11 to 20).
  • The total 11 number of standby redo log files (the group number is from 21 to 31) have always switched (the status is from UNASSIGNED to ACTIVE) on only between 21 and 22 and the rest of 23 - 31 seem to not have been their turn forever. I've observed it from alert log.

Those two number of descriptions above is normal? At the same time I've glanced at Oracle 19c Data Guard Physical Standby, the status are always UNUSED (never showing CLEARING and CURRENT) on redo log files, 11g and 19c has a different action?  

Any ideas for this? Thanks in advance!  

Best Regards

Quanwen Zhao

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jun 01 2023 - 17:47:48 CEST

Original text of this message