Re: some ideas about db rheory
From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c19fb61d-cb71-4abb-997c-87b1c64ea757_at_g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c19fb61d-cb71-4abb-997c-87b1c64ea757_at_g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
Snipped
> My first example infact is from Hillary Putnam. I suggest you to try
> as first step some introducing text about his work, and then in next
> period, try more complex.
> My second example is from one of the most important school in logic.
Any school or person who considers the poor examples provided as being
significant and/or meaningful, in any sense other than metaphysical,
is totally unworthy of inquisitiveness.
Quite the contrary in fact. As far as computing is concerned, the further one gets away from such nonsense the better. Received on Tue Jul 14 2009 - 19:20:43 CEST