Re: ID field as logical address
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:54:54 -0300
Message-ID: <4a268e4f$0$23782$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>>>state of the database.
>>
>>I disagree.
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:54:54 -0300
Message-ID: <4a268e4f$0$23782$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
robur.6_at_gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 3, 4:06 pm, "Brian Selzer" <br..._at_selzer-software.com> wrote: >>>>tuple. It is just a new set of statements consistent with the current
>>>The relation variable changes its state from one set of statements to
>>>a different one. No one should care which tuple was replaced by which
>>>state of the database.
>>
>>I disagree.
BFD. <boring shit snipped> Received on Wed Jun 03 2009 - 16:54:54 CEST