Re: Guessing?
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:34:47 -0300
Message-ID: <4878eb3d$0$4062$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> Ignoring bats and bumblebees, birds *were* special. They were the only
> ones that had structures that generate lift. So anyone claiming to fly
> was obliged to demonstrate they could. The same goes for anyone
> claiming to do anything else we suspect isn't possible.
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:34:47 -0300
Message-ID: <4878eb3d$0$4062$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Roy Hann wrote:
>>All evidence from Da Vinci until 1900 suggested birds were somehow >>special as regards heavier than air flight.
>
> Ignoring bats and bumblebees, birds *were* special. They were the only
> ones that had structures that generate lift. So anyone claiming to fly
> was obliged to demonstrate they could. The same goes for anyone
> claiming to do anything else we suspect isn't possible.
Roy, the point is: Even without demonstrating heavier than air flight, one could extrapolate from ability of birds to fly that heavier than air flight was an achievable engineering goal. To achieve that engineering goal, we first had to understand the physical properties of fluids flowing past rigid surfaces etc. but reasonably informed and intelligent people could predict it would happen. In fact, Da Vinci did predict it centuries before it happened.
The human brain is no more able to provide a general solution to the halting problem than any other computer. Received on Sat Jul 12 2008 - 19:34:47 CEST