Re: Object-relational impedence
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <0222dbc7-bf2b-4a36-8574-926a736dff70_at_i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 16, 2:49 am, "Yagotta B. Kidding" <y..._at_mymail.com> wrote:
> David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote innews:b0d58bd3-e70e-4609-aa96-4b73f0d36184@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
[Snipped nonsense]
> In short DBMS to be scrapped as a concept". They are
> simply unable to understand the problem complexity due to lack of
> education, or experience, or intellingence, or all of the above.
What a dumb ass.
DBMS are not people. They do not understand, nor they have experience etc...If your reasonning matches your mastery of the language and anthropomorphic projections on computing, no wonder why OO will remain an obscure vague concept that should be forgotten in a decade..
It reminds me of the idiots in the 80's were convinced that all SQLDBMS would be replaced by OODBMS so fast (remember JASMINE?). Now we are in 2008 and the OODBMS can not even scratch the good ol' SQL systems.
That says a lot about OO ability to pass the test of time. Received on Sun Mar 16 2008 - 14:21:11 CET