Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Robert Martin <unclebob_at_objectmentor.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:48:43 -0500
Message-ID: <2008031020484399097-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
>> On 2008-03-05 09:58:43 -0600, Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> said:
>>
>>
>>
>> How awful for you.
>
> I accept you apology.
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:48:43 -0500
Message-ID: <2008031020484399097-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
On 2008-03-06 01:03:26 -0600, Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> said:
> On Mar 5, 10:48 pm, Robert Martin <uncle..._at_objectmentor.com> wrote:
>> On 2008-03-05 09:58:43 -0600, Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> said:
>>
>>>> You are confusing OO with static typing.
>>
>>> How supremely annoying to have gone to some lengths >>> to carefully use the most strictly defined, modern type >>> system terminology, only to have it labeled as a novice >>> error by someone who missed my point entirely.
>>
>> How awful for you.
>
> I accept you apology.
<grin>
-- Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) | email: unclebob_at_objectmentor.com Object Mentor Inc. | blog: www.butunclebob.com The Agile Transition Experts | web: www.objectmentor.com 800-338-6716 |Received on Tue Mar 11 2008 - 02:48:43 CET