Re: DB design issue
From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 18 Nov 2006 09:25:08 -0800
Message-ID: <1163870707.970204.292550_at_h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Date: 18 Nov 2006 09:25:08 -0800
Message-ID: <1163870707.970204.292550_at_h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
> A system can have zero or more interface.
> An interface can have zero or more message.
> A message can have zero or more datafield with an ordered position.
> A datafield can be a simple one (like integer, float, etc)
> or composed by other datafield.
> Then I'm wondering about the db data model.
If the data can be as follows...
System1
Interface1
Interface2
Msg1 Msg2 Field1 (simple) Field2 (simple) Field3 (complex) Field100 (simple) Field101 (simple) Field102 (complex) Field200 (simple) Field201 (siimple)
... maybe the following main tables will be needed:
T_System T_Interface T_Msg T_Field (... isSimple? ...); T_ParChildField
The most challenge part may be managing fields which can be composed of fields. Received on Sat Nov 18 2006 - 18:25:08 CET