Re: Bob needs a new catchphrase
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_dbms.yuc>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:43:20 GMT
Message-ID: <cAI2h.244809$1T2.338_at_pd7urf2no>
>
> My response to him after about 2 days in c.d.t was *plonk* because (as
> the name of my Thunderbird Filter Rule states) "Bob Badour's a dick".
> Consequently, I get to be blissfully unaware of Bob Badour's dickness,
> except when he is replied to...
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:43:20 GMT
Message-ID: <cAI2h.244809$1T2.338_at_pd7urf2no>
Beowulf wrote:
> Pickie wrote:
>> >> And so I concluded that "Bob needs a new catchphrase". We can all help >> him out here. It should capture the apoplectic splenetic dyspeptic >> querulousness that the name "Bob Badour" exemplifies. Moreover, it >> should have a bit more lasting power than the old phrase. And Bob, if >> you could just be the teensiest bit more judicious in your use of it, >> your posts might not be so boring. Well, not so quickly boring, anyway.
>
> My response to him after about 2 days in c.d.t was *plonk* because (as
> the name of my Thunderbird Filter Rule states) "Bob Badour's a dick".
> Consequently, I get to be blissfully unaware of Bob Badour's dickness,
> except when he is replied to...
p Received on Fri Nov 03 2006 - 15:43:20 CET