Re: A statement on dbdebunk.

Frank Hamersley wrote:
> Keith H Duggar wrote:
> >
> > It seems the only slop so far (and it's in this thread) has
> > been the assumption of isomorphism. 1:1 != isomorphic.
>
> Pray tell how you reached this stunning conclusion! I'm
> all eyes!

Huh? What "stunning conclusion"?

Perhaps you did not read my previous response to Erwin? Read that. Then restate your question (if one remains) using more specific language.

• Keith -- Fraud 6