Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements

dawn wrote:
> [snippage]
> > No, I think the web is too entrenched now. It'd take a revolution not
> > an evolution.
>
> Like some ignorant, moronic girl trying to move the industry away from
> SQL, right?

...?

> [snippage]
> I've learned a lot from you guys. I came here to learn and I have. I
> have learned more about human nature than I really wanted to learn, but
> ah well.

Bad dawn - you know It takes two to tango. :(

> [snippage]
> So, we still differ on terminology.

that's good hey. terminology generates a lot of miscommunication but ultimately it is a minor thing.

> [snippage]
> A theory, like relational theory, might be tight mathematically, but that
> is no proof that it is the best way to model propositions, for example.

Well the thing is we all agree with this. I doubt anyone has the naivite to say the RM is the final word and that an improved theory may not arise in the millennia ahead of us.

> I might not have said that well, but I'm clicking to send anyway.
> Cheers! --dawn
>
> Thanks for the dialog, jog. --dawn

no problem. (dialogue by the way. US variations are so colourful...) Received on Wed Aug 16 2006 - 13:07:23 CEST