Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
From: Keith H Duggar <duggar_at_alum.mit.edu>
Date: 14 Aug 2006 18:21:23 -0700
Message-ID: <1155604883.004368.176900_at_74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
Date: 14 Aug 2006 18:21:23 -0700
Message-ID: <1155604883.004368.176900_at_74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
Bob Badour wrote:
> Keith H Duggar wrote:
>
> > erk wrote:
> >
> >>Keith H Duggar wrote:
> >>
> >>Fraud e will do nicely, I think.
> >>
> >>- Fraud e
> >
> > A natural choice, though not as perfect as 6. ;-)
> >
> > -- Keith -- Fraud 6
>
> Why can't we all be Fraud 4? That's what I want to know.
You mean convert to C'mode numerals?. Received on Tue Aug 15 2006 - 03:21:23 CEST