Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements

From: dawn <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com>
Date: 11 Aug 2006 19:37:34 -0700
Message-ID: <1155350254.499288.100100_at_74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>


dawn wrote:
> Bob Badour wrote:
> > erk wrote:
> >
> > > dawn wrote:
> > >
> > >>OK, or perhaps "the use of 1NF" was flawed
> >
> > What an idiot! Even after three years she is too stupid to realize that
> > 1NF is not flawed at all while NFNF has too many flaws to enumerate easily.
> >
> >
> >
> > , while there is nothing
> > >>wrong with coining and defining it.
> >
> > What a complete moronic ass.
>
> Coincidentially, at lunch today I was told that in the quote from
> Matthew "if the salt has lost its saltiness" the "has lost its
> saltiness" is the translation of the Greek "moronic" (or variation
> thereof).
>
> I assure you that I have not lost my saltiness
>
> (I was going to say that my ass has not, as that would have played with
> both words, but it was just too nasty, perhaps coming a bit too close
> to JOG's interests ;-)

Oops, looks like that was erk. My apologies. You guys all look alike. Received on Sat Aug 12 2006 - 04:37:34 CEST

Original text of this message