Re: Why bother with Logical data model?

Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:22:20 GMT, Bob Badour
> <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >JOG wrote:
> >
> >> I have just invented a new layer called the 'conceptalogical layer'.
> >> It's meaningless obviously but sounds like just the sort of thing I
> >> could build a software business on. It's a winner I tell you
> >> </cynicism>
> >
> >It's going to have a tough time competing against my new logceptysical
> >model. Let's see who gets the book deal first! ;)
>
> My money is on JOG. His term is easy to say. Yours is awkward.

A wise choice my friend. You'll find the conceptalogical layer design software is perfect for modular e-driven enterprise-level solutions, due to its concurrent extensible semantics.

I'm going to need a US distributor.

>
> I take that back. *MY* model is better. I call it
> "Conilogisal". In accordance with the first syllable, I am prepared
> to accept bribes in order to leave the market to the two of you.
> Please be generous.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Gene Wirchenko
Received on Thu Aug 10 2006 - 21:26:01 CEST