Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:18:29 GMT
Message-ID: <91nCg.37849$pu3.494785_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
>
> Is there theory behind any of this? Any mathematical models or other
> formalisms? It seems to me that comparing Cache with Oracle for
> TCO is not on-topic on c.d.t.
>
> Does any of "what works today outside of the RM" have any theory
> behind it? This is a theory newsgroup after all.
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:18:29 GMT
Message-ID: <91nCg.37849$pu3.494785_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>>I agree. If we are going to start somewhere and move forward, we might >>be well-served to look to what works today outside of the RM (even >>though it, of course, typically markets itself as relational). Is it >>less expensive to work with Cache' than Oracle given such and such an >>environment? If so, why?
>
>
> Is there theory behind any of this? Any mathematical models or other
> formalisms? It seems to me that comparing Cache with Oracle for
> TCO is not on-topic on c.d.t.
>
> Does any of "what works today outside of the RM" have any theory
> behind it? This is a theory newsgroup after all.
Ugh. Is she back to grind that idiotic pick-axe again? Received on Wed Aug 09 2006 - 17:18:29 CEST