Re: computational model of transactions

From: vc <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 4 Aug 2006 20:19:32 -0700
Message-ID: <1154747972.305964.117430_at_p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>


Erwin wrote:

> Since each of them wants to update the very same resource (the same
> attribute of the same tuple of the same relvar), these transactions
> should be serialized anyway.

Not necessarily. Read any book on MVCC.

>
> No two things can be in the same place at the same time.
Received on Sat Aug 05 2006 - 05:19:32 CEST

Original text of this message