Re: why hierarchy?
From: erk <eric.kaun_at_gmail.com>
Date: 4 Aug 2006 12:50:12 -0700
Message-ID: <1154721012.641250.287040_at_i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
etc.
Date: 4 Aug 2006 12:50:12 -0700
Message-ID: <1154721012.641250.287040_at_i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
JOG wrote:
> Another cracking quote on XML from C. M. SPERBERG-MCQUEEN ( a member of
> the technical staff of the World Wide Web Consortium)
>
> "In the wild (that is, in documents, reports, and program
> data structures as they are encountered in daily life),
> information takes forms rather different from third normal
> form."
>
> Yup, that's right, "information takes forms rather different from third
> normal form". Don't worry about the fact that third normal form is just
> a way of rearranging true propositions in a lossless way. No siree,
> because that would make it _totally_ different information. Good grief,
> how does this stuff get published.
Nice.
I especially like the fool's notions that:
1. information has a "natural" form 2. there's a "wild" in which information "lives" 3. "program data structures" are... well, something-or-other 4. reports are "data structures"
etc.
- erk