Re: why hierarchy?
From: J M Davitt <jdavitt_at_aeneas.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:58:52 GMT
Message-ID: <Mrzzg.39489$vl5.1723_at_tornado.ohiordc.rr.com>
>
>
> If he had, could we send John to jail for having relations with a verb?
> Should we?
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:58:52 GMT
Message-ID: <Mrzzg.39489$vl5.1723_at_tornado.ohiordc.rr.com>
Bob Badour wrote:
> Aloha Kakuikanu wrote:
>
>> Neo wrote: >> >>> which would confuse most people since, for starters, >>> john is not a verb/relator. >> >> >> Do you expect the "relator" to be in the dummies vocabulary?
>
>
> If he had, could we send John to jail for having relations with a verb?
> Should we?
Don't we first have to know how old the verb is? Do I correctly presume that "relations" refers to the variety of intercourse which isn't social? Received on Tue Aug 01 2006 - 04:58:52 CEST