Re: computational model of transactions
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:46:11 GMT
Message-ID: <DYPzg.309004$IK3.168423_at_pd7tw1no>
>> Bob Badour wrote:
...
>> Like give all 100,000 employees a 10% raise. Still, that kind of commit
>> is not what I call a logical commit, suggesting that a commit doesn't
>> mark a luw boundary. I've heard it called an 'intermediate', aka
>> physical, commit.
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:46:11 GMT
Message-ID: <DYPzg.309004$IK3.168423_at_pd7tw1no>
Cimode wrote:
> paul c wrote:
>> Bob Badour wrote:
>>> paul c wrote: >>> >>>> Bob Badour wrote: >>>> >>>>> paul c wrote: >>>>> ...
...
>> Like give all 100,000 employees a 10% raise. Still, that kind of commit
>> is not what I call a logical commit, suggesting that a commit doesn't
>> mark a luw boundary. I've heard it called an 'intermediate', aka
>> physical, commit.
> I understand and agree with this last point. As I mentionned this is a > complex problem and a simplyistic solution just won't do it. > ...
p Received on Tue Aug 01 2006 - 23:46:11 CEST