Re: computational model of transactions
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:59:51 GMT
Message-ID: <bhPzg.301322$iF6.265726_at_pd7tw2no>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:59:51 GMT
Message-ID: <bhPzg.301322$iF6.265726_at_pd7tw2no>
Bob Badour wrote:
> ...
> Marshall's proposal is more severe than serializable. A user would not
> see his own updates to the database until after committed. With the
> serializable isolation level, one still sees prior updates within the
> transaction.
> ...
Just to be clear as succintly as I can. I believe Marshall's proposal is exactly what the two-phase locking protocol means.
p Received on Tue Aug 01 2006 - 22:59:51 CEST