Re: Counting propositions
From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:08:57 +0300
Message-ID: <40cf1e1d$1_at_post.usenet.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:08:57 +0300
Message-ID: <40cf1e1d$1_at_post.usenet.com>
- Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message
news:-uKdnTSpHbxPjVLdRVn-gQ_at_comcast.com...
>
> "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in
>
> > I suspect most designers would suggest that if you have the information
on
> > which the aggregate is based, then you put that into a base relation and
> > aggregate from the granular data. But there are so many exceptions to
> this
> > in actual use.
>
>
> You might want to look over Kimball's book on warehousing. He writes a
bit
> on "choosing the granularity". It's fairly crucial in MDDB design.
Aside: How many Zen Buddhists are practicing Relational Theory ?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=