Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)

From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 5 Jun 2004 12:42:35 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0406051142.2bd74e44_at_posting.google.com>


> > [In the] general methods for determining a thing's class(es),
> > If I substitute 'person' for 'john' both return 0 records.
>
> In the challenge, there is no need to extract the class of 'person' from
> the database. The challenge had some classes (church, force, person, dog
> and computer, if I remember well). None of these had a superclass, other
> that the universal superclass "thing". Since everything is a thing, I did
> not store it.

The original challenge asks to "produce ... Report ... allow the user to create any hierarchy". The class hierarchy is a subset of any hierarchy. The intent was to create a report on any hierarchy, including class hierarchy. Received on Sat Jun 05 2004 - 21:42:35 CEST

Original text of this message