Re: It don't mean a thing ...

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 01:33:12 +0200
Message-ID: <40bd122d$0$563$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>


 > "Bill H wrote:

>>
>>Butcher the meaning of the word "facts", make "implicit"
>>mean anything we want it to mean, and voila: a perfectly
>>useless pontification that can be passed off to our youth
>>as learning, who may not know any better. :-)

Alan wrote:
> "Implicit":
> 1. Being without doubt or reserve

Butchering "implicit" already.
How about implicit as opposed to explicit? Received on Wed Jun 02 2004 - 01:33:12 CEST

Original text of this message