Re: database systems and organizational intelligence

From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 17:06:44 -0700
Message-ID: <lmhnb0954ujsoj2812n96ff6vr7iddg1k9_at_4ax.com>


Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm> wrote:

[snip]

>> None of us have, although I'd still be interested to hear more from those
>> who dealt with old network databases as SQL was coming to the forefront...
>> SQL was embraced as solving problems, but did it? Did it solve some and
>> introduce new ones?

     Does not every new solution do that?

> SQL is hugely superior to everything before it. In xBase,

     Quite though hardly perfect.

>ISAM, CODASYL, IMS you had to program your way around. No optimiser,
>no declarations, no ad hoc end-users...

     It is good of you to use past tense since at least one of these (xBASE) has had SQL for about fifteen years.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.
Received on Tue Jun 01 2004 - 02:06:44 CEST

Original text of this message