Re: WHAT vs HOW vs WHERE
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 22:12:20 GMT
Message-ID: <7bbnb0tusu6uu1m7lp6elnu1q84hapa5hu_at_4ax.com>
On Mon, 31 May 2004 17:43:01 +0300 in comp.databases.theory, "x" <x-false_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>
>
>"Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra" <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm> wrote
>in message news:pan.2004.05.31.12.07.23.235040_at_dutra.fastmail.fm...
>> Em Sat, 29 May 2004 16:58:24 +0000, Alfredo Novoa escreveu:
>>
>> >> Indexes are full of pointers.
>> >
>> > Indexes are obsolete :-)
>>
>> Only if and when transrelational or something the like works,
>> AFAIU.
>>
>> Until them, the better point is that indexes should be hidden
>> from the users. They are a DBA concern only.
>>
>
>No. In TransRelational (TM) *all* data is indexes :-)
>This is the trick *they* don't want you to know :-)
Oh, god! Please don't tell me someone is trying to flog a product based on the old inverted index approach, and claim it's new?
-- Thanks. Take care, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada Brian.Inglis_at_CSi.com (Brian dot Inglis at SystematicSw dot ab dot ca) fake address use address above to replyReceived on Tue Jun 01 2004 - 00:12:20 CEST