Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)
From: Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:20:54 -0300
Message-ID: <pan.2004.06.01.20.20.53.966095_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
>
> No, unless I miss-understood what you meant by that. A relation refers to
> the relationship between data members of the same 'table'. A 'table' was
> originally called a relation.
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:20:54 -0300
Message-ID: <pan.2004.06.01.20.20.53.966095_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
Em Fri, 21 May 2004 17:32:02 +1000, thirdrock escreveu:
>> You might be surprised to hear this, but there's a reason that the >> relational model is called "relational". It's about storing relations.
>
> No, unless I miss-understood what you meant by that. A relation refers to
> the relationship between data members of the same 'table'. A 'table' was
> originally called a relation.
Well, that is then storing a relation.
What do you call data members? Actually a relation is defined as a subset of the cartesian product of some domains, relationships will only enter the picture if you consider the predicate a relationship -- but then I would feel like stretching the term.
-- Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11) 5685 2219 Av Sgto Geraldo Santana, 1100 6/71 leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm 04.674-000 São Paulo, SP BRASIL http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/Received on Tue Jun 01 2004 - 22:20:54 CEST