Re: DMoz Relational Implementations category: chaff from wheat

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 09:19:56 -0400
Message-ID: <iJmdnQCUIaG0HyHdRVn-sw_at_comcast.com>

"Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra" <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm> wrote in message news:pan.2004.06.01.01.08.57.358925_at_dutra.fastmail.fm...

>
> I hate categories!
>

Good! Now if you will stop categorizing people as "trolls", "snake oil salesmen" or "uneducated" and simply respond to each message on the merits of that message, you will have taken a great step forward! Received on Tue Jun 01 2004 - 15:19:56 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: mAsterdam: "It don't mean a thing ..."
Previous message: Laconic2: "Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)"
Maybe reply: Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra: "Re: DMoz Relational Implementations category: chaff from wheat"
Maybe reply: Christopher Browne: "Re: DMoz Relational Implementations category: chaff from wheat"
Maybe reply: Christopher Browne: "Re: DMoz Relational Implementations category: chaff from wheat"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message