Re: c.d.theory glossary - RELATION
From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:34:48 +0300
Message-ID: <40925541_at_post.usenet.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:34:48 +0300
Message-ID: <40925541_at_post.usenet.com>
- Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:ke-dnfbLDpzv0g_dRVn-vA_at_comcast.com...
> In the meantime, I think it's unfortunate that both the Relational and
the
> ER model use the word "ATTRIBUTES".
It seems that in relational model the ATTRIBUTES are describing each other.
> The first time I learned the ER model, about 20 years ago, they described
> one of the attributes as a KEY ATTRIBUTE.
> I would say that an entity is REPRESENTED by its key attribute. BUt I'm
not
> sure that's really legitimate.
What comes first: the key or the entity ? :-)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=