Re: newby (very) question on XML DB theory
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:04:28 +0100
Message-ID: <M1WkWEBcQ+jAFwA9_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
In message <ZaidnYT4ptOgxeDdRVn-vw_at_comcast.com>, Laconic2
<laconic2_at_comcast.net> writes
>
>> Yes, but have you seen any industry standards for query GUI's? --dawn
>
>No, and that's the whole point. If you share persistent data, and you don't
>have standards, you get an unrecognizable mess.
>
>If you impose rigid standards on data as presented to the user, you
>prevent the user from "doing whatever the user wants".
>
>I wish there could be user interface that would make the data "look like"
>PICK data to you, while the real underlying data is actually in 1NF, and
>maybe more. Or how about a PICK with an SQL interface?
>
In other words, any modern Pick?
AFAIK they pretty much all work fine with SQL - it's just that their native query language is easier to use (if you're querying, not updating).
Cheers,
Wol
-- Anthony W. Youngman - wol at thewolery dot demon dot co dot uk HEX wondered how much he should tell the Wizards. He felt it would not be a good idea to burden them with too much input. Hex always thought of his reports as Lies-to-People. The Science of Discworld : (c) Terry Pratchett 1999Received on Wed Apr 28 2004 - 19:04:28 CEST