Re: Pizza Example
From: Anthony W. Youngman <wol_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:39:40 +0100
Message-ID: <ZIAx5BDMkDhAFwBA_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:39:40 +0100
Message-ID: <ZIAx5BDMkDhAFwBA_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
In message <0LQgc.9749$kF5.6280_at_newssvr31.news.prodigy.com>, Eric Kaun
<ekaun_at_yahoo.com> writes
>> And, for example with optimisation, if you gamble on that being the case
>> then you will win big nine times out of ten.
>
>Discussions of gambling in the context of data design are somewhat
>misplaced. Last I knew, we were trying to create order from chaos, not
>systematize the chaos.
"In the battle between order and chaos, chaos will always win because it is better organised" :-)
Anyway, there's gambling on a hunch, and gambling on a dead cert. Betting shops only gamble on dead certs - they've done the statistics to prove it. Same with Pick :-)
Cheers,
Wol
-- Anthony W. Youngman - wol at thewolery dot demon dot co dot uk HEX wondered how much he should tell the Wizards. He felt it would not be a good idea to burden them with too much input. Hex always thought of his reports as Lies-to-People. The Science of Discworld : (c) Terry Pratchett 1999Received on Mon Apr 19 2004 - 22:39:40 CEST