Re: Oracle slowed down

From: Bob Jones <email_at_me.not>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:52:59 GMT
Message-ID: <%9P2g.13843$4L1.2975@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>

"Frank van Bortel" <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:e2gclf$u9f$4_at_news4.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> Bob Jones wrote:

>>>> So you have seen 2 completely identical systems, apart from the buffer
>>>> cache, the one with 30% hits outperforms the other with 100% hits. You
>>>> must
>>>> have disks that are faster than memory.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You're wrong, again.
>>> BCHR does not say a thing about performance.
>>>
>>
>> If you have seen such systems, I don't doubt you come up with this
>> conclusion.
>

> OK - let's turn this around. I give in.
> I have a system with a BCHR of 85%. Consistently.

>

> Now you tell me - is the performance OK?
>
> --

This is exactly what I am talking about. You have not read my previous postings, have you? There is no fixed number to shoot for. Received on Sun Apr 23 2006 - 12:52:59 CDT