Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oralce 10g2/RAC on AIX. ASM or GPFS?

Re: Oralce 10g2/RAC on AIX. ASM or GPFS?

From: JEDIDIAH <jedi_at_nomad.mishnet>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:16:46 -0600
Message-ID: <er5tf3-464.ln1@nomad.mishnet>


On 2006-03-30, Mladen Gogala <gogala_at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 04:25:40 -0800, Karma wrote:
>
>> We are locked into AIX, so Linux is out of the question for now anyway.
>> I suppose the benefits of using ASM are not that big of a deal to the
>> DBA?
>> I/O is spread across all disks to help eliminate hot spot
>> Automatic distribution of storage amongst a disk group
>> Lower cost in my case
>> Oracle seems to want to move in this direction
>
> You are asking wrong questions. To decide whether to use ASM or not, you
> should ask yourself whether it is possible to access data structures
> within ASM with other means or just by oracle. Can you use tar on ASM
> files or not? ASM is just a volume manager. Compare it with the native
> volume managers for EMC and AIX and decide which one is a better fit for
> your needs.
>

        If you have an interest in treating your databases like simple collections of files that you can tar up and drop down anywhere in your environment, ASM is probably not for you. Using ASM it seems will commit you to using it throughout your environment (dev, test, etc).

-- 
	Sure, I could use iTunes even under Linux. However, I have       |||
better things to do with my time than deal with how iTunes doesn't      / | \
want to play nicely with everyone else's data (namely mine). I'd 
rather create a DVD using those Linux apps we're told don't exist.
Received on Thu Mar 30 2006 - 08:16:46 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US