Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: A WTF in the Oracle reference...

Re: A WTF in the Oracle reference...

From: Joel Garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: 18 Jan 2006 10:38:22 -0800
Message-ID: <1137609502.794337.93310@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


Now that I know what book it is and have looked at it in context, I would say it could be sometimes profoundly retarded. For example, using names as a natural key would likely necessitate some data massage to keep it consistent in order to search without using functions. Keeping the data all caps with another primary key would be retarded. Letting the users denormalize primary keys by being able to put in MacDonald and Macdonald would be profoundly retarded.

Would you believe I spent a couple of hours yesterday dealing with something similarly profoundly retarded. One must perfect the art of naming things without implied value judgements, lest the users realize what you think and stop paying you.

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.  " A test carried out by Pegasus Lab on account for
Swedish magazine PC För alla showed that a normal PC keyboard was
infected by more bacteria than a normal toilet seat. More specific it
contained 33000 bacteria per square centimeter, compared to 130 on a
ordinary toilet seat. The tests also showed occurrence of up to 3100
fungi per square centimeter."  - /.
Received on Wed Jan 18 2006 - 12:38:22 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US