Re: A WTF in the Oracle reference...

chaoslight_at_gmail.com wrote:
> Jeremy írta:
> > In article <1137596468.281193.53290_at_o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
> > says...
> > >
> > > I am not an Oracle expert. I am merely competent. I felt that the
> > > advice written in that book was stupid, but I thought that it was quite
> > > possible that I had overlooked something. This seemed like the best
> > > place to ask about it.
> >
> > I think it was a perfectly reasonable place to bring up the question.
> > However, you should have taken the time to identify the name of the
> > aource you were quoting in the first place - phrasing it as "Here's a
> > quote from the Oracle reference guide, page 27:" does imply to the group
> > that it is material from Oracle.
>
> Yes, I realize that now. The guide I quoted from is the one we use at
> work; it looked pretty official, and I never bothered checking who
> wrote it. Stupid of me, yes. Sorry about the confusion. :)

I agree that the underlying subject could be a topic for sensible debate. However the question as asked, that I was responding to, was not. And I was responding without the aid of gazzag's and others telepathic suppositions of what the OP had already done and what they really meant by Oracle Reference, retards and WTF. Received on Wed Jan 18 2006 - 11:35:39 CST